135d
Any date about implementation? Are other teams working in other pre-consensus systems?
  131d
  129d
  129d
Seems like a good idea to me.
  129d
0-confirmations accepted on exchanges is not new. XVC had that on Poloniex about 2 years back.
  127d
PoS pre-consensus, really? is this still bitcoin?...
  127d
Yes.
  127d
From Snowflake to Avalanche -
  127d
Using Avalanche for Pre-Consensus on Nakamoto Consensus Protocols -
&feature=youtu.be
  127d
See my replies to @Rozjemca35 above (and the second video above) for explanation of why PoS is NOT being discussed as part of Avalanche pre-consensus protocol.
  127d
If avalanche is soft-fork, can the pre-consensus pow be replaced with pos also as a soft fork?
  127d
Do you mean that instead of the miners of the last 100 blocks, the pre-consensus group will be sustituted be coin stackers? Will be more complicated, you need to enforce them to pay if dishonest.
  116d
  115d
Amaury explains it better and simpler:"Basically, it is like Ripple" RIP
  113d
Avalanche seems like a great idea the more I hear about it. Helos scaling, and protection against double spends.
  93d
  93d
I'm not sure why so many people are assuming they will jump straight into PoS with Avalanche, they've said they eventually intend to base selection on PoW contribution for over 100 prior blocks
  93d
I think it's an elegant and practical solution. I was a fan of 0-conf forfeits, but I think that this will add a considerable amount of security
  92d
Anybody knows if avalanche will make it into BCH?
  92d
Never, if they're lucky.
  91d
Amaury explains Avalanche
  82d
Avalanche preconsensus does have some good potential. Can't wait to see how well it works.
  81d
Is it in alpha now?
  70d
Just when I thought they are not going to do it
  70d
BCH Devs: Making @SharkPoolCash job easier daily. Since 2018. @_opreturn https://memo.cash/topic/Avalanche
  68d
Avalanche really is a great idea.