Create account

replied 2117d
I'm going off of what he said.
replied 2116d
Reddit, Bitcointalk, Twitter is censored or heavily manipulated with bots is what I meant.
replied 2116d
That is true. That is why I wish #Memo would take it's development more seriously because soon it will become the last viable option
replied 2116d
We need more front ends for the memo protocol.
replied 2114d
Not more in numbers, we need more quality in one frontend.
replied 2114d
memo-like sites can be censored/manipulated on the front end, so optimally there should be several high quality sites.
replied 2114d
No. Multiple sites fragment the userbase and disunite the community. There has to be one uncensorable open-source site.
replied 2114d
It's not fragmenting anything, every comment is on the blockchain and should be accessible on every site implementing the protocol, it's just an onramp. You don't need the site to post
replied 2114d
Nearly everyone will need a frontend to post because nearly no one will post without one. It's too complicated otherwise.
replied 2114d
It's not complicated at all, it's an open, pretty well designed protocol - https://memo.cash/protocol

Someone who needs censorship resistance usually doesn't mind 2min of research
replied 2114d
I'm into tech but I don't know what OP_Return or any of that means. Most ppl just want to post on a website. New technology has to make things easier, not harder
replied 2114d
It's possible that it might be a bit too much for older/very tech-challenged users, but it's unlikely they would even be in crypto at this point. Could always make a video for them too
replied 2114d
That's not true, anyone can be into #crypto because #crypto is not about the tech. Do u really think most ppl who use Instagram is interested in the tech part?
replied 2114d
Instagram has a network effect, people join because everyone is using it. Memo won't have that for 10-20 years at this rate, and specifically *because* people don't understand the tech
replied 2114d
No. Ppl join because Instagram has interesting content that is only available on Instagram. That networking effect is the reason for it's RAPID growth, but not for the GROWTH it's self
replied 2114d
Itself*
replied 2114d
If they understood that centralized services will all leak/sell their data and take possession of their work, they would join Memo instantly. We need more people to understand the tech
replied 2114d
Just to clarify, USERS would join #Memo if there was better content. Content creators would join if they knew they had total control of their content and acct on a platform like #Memo
replied 2114d
>Content creators would join if they knew they had total control of their content and acct on a platform like #Memo

That's what I said lol. You can't have better content w/o creators.
replied 2114d
Just clarifying users would not join because of data security because they follow the content creators. It's content creators who will come for data security.
replied 2114d
Not exclusively, you're thinking of property rights and demonetization. Data security affects all users, just look at the Ashley Madison leaks, etc.
replied 2114d
I am using data security as a general term, but yes property rights, demonetization, and all of the above. Users will always follow the content creators. Where C.C.s go, so will users
replied 2114d
The main point I was trying to make was that data security affects everyone, but advertising/celebrity/bot activity also draws users, as it did with Twitter. The network effect exists
replied 2114d
Data security does effect everyone. All I am saying is #Memo will have to draw the content creators to grow, then the users will come after.
replied 2114d
I agree with that, though I also think that educating regular users about data security can create a network effect for the platform. It would take all of us doing it though, and more
replied 2114d
That would be nice, but most ppl including me would rather leave that to the data security experts because that's their job. Median users aren't mad understand it
replied 2114d
Most people are aware of all the shady shit Facebook and other centralized social media corps pull, and care about it, but are in denial because their network effect is too strong
replied 2114d
It's not denial. It's lack of a better option. People know the world is messed up, they just don't know a better option. Even with fiat currency to insecure social media platforms
replied 2114d
Several people that I've warned about Facebook say that they can't quit, usually because they either advertise there, or just because everyone uses it and they want to keep in touch
replied 2114d
If you smoke enough cigarettes you will probably get #cancer. Quitting is hard, but it's most likely worth it.

Have you ever seen people with a hole in their neck?
Simon Van Gelder
replied 2114d
You can only quit if you want to quit. If you want to quit, it is disorienting, but not all that difficult. The wanting is the hard part.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 2114d
Breaking an addiction is an inherently violent process (you must destroy part or all of "yourself"). People tend to shy away from violence.
replied 2114d
That's an interesting way to think about it, I always saw it as distancing yourself from a dependency. It's much easier if you replace bad habits with constructive ones
replied 2114d
It's not always necessary to quit entirely either, some bad habits aren't that bad if done in moderation
Dos
replied 2114d
Quitter since 2006. No nicotine no alcohol. Only couple of months was tough in the beginning. Just a matter of habits lol.
replied 2114d
I had trouble quitting cigarettes too, but kicked them pretty easily when I started dating a non-smoker. It's nearly impossible without a good reason though, I'm at ~4 years now
replied 2114d
You can only quit an addiction if you have a good enough reason period. A good WHY? (reason to quit) will carry you through every single obstacle and hard time.
replied 2114d
Agreed. In my case, I basically have to break before I decide to make a change.
replied 2114d
It's because the content creators are there and #Memo and other decentralized platforms are not yet viable alternatives to Twitter and Facebook.
replied 2114d
and having to actually use it is a big part of that. Attention will probably grow with time and more scandals/injustices from tech/social media, but we need to be educating people too
replied 2114d
It's just a protocol. You could run a full node for a few bucks and see for yourself memo is honest. Btw, memo.cash is providing tx id so you could verify it on an explorer isn't it?
replied 2114d
Just a protocol yes, but there still has to be one site everyone goes to on the frontend that is the default. I.e. the Twitter of #crypto and the best solution will win.
replied 2114d
I don't think that you understand how memo works.

All sites have the same content because all of them index the same transactions.
replied 2114d
In analogy it's like the wallets for BitcoinCash. It doesn't matter what wallet you use, you can send/receive tx from any BCH compatible wallet.
replied 2114d
Repeat after me:

Single points of failure are bad.
replied 2114d
You are dead wrong on this one.
replied 2114d
You have 0 comprehension of the topic dude.
replied 2114d
Memo could change hands and start removing posts accounts easily (it takes about 1 line of code).
replied 2114d
Also, ponder, that these are just front ends, they use the same data source (bch transactions)
replied 2114d
So new frontends would not fracture the userbase at all, as long as they are compatible with the memo protocol (basically the way actions are identified).
replied 2114d