177d
NASA means to decieve in the Jewish language #truth #nocurve #wakeup #justice
177d
Are you an FE'er?
176d
I am a Bible believer and the Bible supports a stationary earth. "Who laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not be removed for ever."
Psalms 104:5 KJV #stationaryearth #sedm #truth
176d
But obviously that sentence can be interpreted in a myriad of ways? For example, "The earth should not be removed from its orbit in our solar system"
170d
Naw the earth isn't rotating at a 1000mph or else we would feel the difference in different parts of the ball surface. #earthdoesntmove
170d
And you say this with such certainty because you did the math? If so, explain what is wrong with the calculation here https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/7432-are-you-lighter-nearer-the-equator/
170d
If you didn't do the math, beware that sometimes intuition fails us, and we do have to check with calculation (you actually ask us to check stuff elsewhere btw). It is in fact a standing joke...
170d
that "the one weakness FE'er have is math". This because statements from FE'ers that do not stand up to mathematical scrutiny are totally rampant on the web.
170d
I suppose the way I put that, it is not a joke, at least it is not funny, but who cares.
169d
ah how i love those beautiful glitches in simulation, they are much rare these days...
169d
Yes, though the hard part is finding out which part is the glitch and which is the simulation.
169d
Math doesn't always add up to real life. Everything has to be verified through testing. I can easily observe the earth doesn't curve nor moves.
169d
I don't really think you can observe these things. You can make observations that you BELIEVE show you this, but your own logic is not infallible, and it is easy to make mistakes.
169d
As for math not adding up to real life, it doesn't if your model of the world does not add up. But you picking the wrong model of the world is not the fault of math, it is just formalized logic
169d
... math is just formalized logic that is. Anyway, the reason I looked at the math was, my immediate question about your claim was, WOULD I feel the pull from earth's rotation?
169d
It is not obvious that just because something moves/rotates fast compared to the things we are used to dealing with, that it actually gives a strong pull. How would you verify this claim?
168d
Computers easily simulate the globe curve math visually. Then compare reality to the simulation and it is not the same.
168d
Too often when I discuss a proposition (here: "Earth is flat") with someone, they put forward a claim supposed to prove it. When I show it does not prove the proposition they jump to another...
168d
claim, and if I show that this claim also does not prove it, they jump to another, and another. In theory they can go on like this forever. And they usually stay sure of themselves while they do
168d
this. What I don't understand is, when they are shown to be wrong, why don't they look inside themselves for how they could be mistaken instead of going on like nothing had happened?
168d
As for math, you just rejected it, claiming it "doesn't always add up to real life" one day ago. You'll have to excuse me for not trusting your word about math.
168d
Or did you change your mind both about your "we would feel the rotation" claim and the "math doesn't always add up to real life" claim?
165d
Since I am the only one left talking here, I can just go on and talk about whatever I wish I suppose. :)
165d
While there are several things I do not like in it this vid, it refers to some very "low tech" stuff, that anyone can relate to or test.
8d
4h