Topic - Fire Amaury Sechet

Back to topics Threads View 6 followers

  384d
You would think Amaury would be more careful about possibly affecting the economic model, especially after the EDA debacle.
  384d
How can one fire someone is isn't being employed in the first place?
  384d
Its a metaphor. The point is to try to convince miners to stop running ABC
  378d
  378d
Ether he is trolling or testing the waters for a defection.
  378d
  378d
  378d
  378d
Just how much evidence to people need?
  378d
  378d
Seems as if CSW is a complete idiot that needs his safe space
  378d
CSW has a long track record of being right against everyone that doubts him. Made Vitalik look like a dumb high school kid. Same goes for Szabo. Satoshi gets the benefit of the doubt.
  378d
Notice how quiet the anti-CSW trolls are here compared to reddit? They are mostly Blockstream employees that don't have BCH
  378d
if there is budget to hire trolls, there is budget to dispense a few BCH sats for the trolling.
  378d
As if this entire thread isn't paid for by CSW and his sycophants
  378d
All I can say for certain is that I am not paid, by CSW at least.
  378d
you're right majorpayne, CSW is paying us all. He's going FULL BILLIONAIRE MODE on your ass! /s LOL
  378d
If someone can tell me who to contact to collect the money allotted to people who don't hate CSW please tell me. Asking for a friend.
  378d
Lately, this community is focusing too much in personalities and egos. Let's debate ideas and forget who are behind them.
  378d
Our money brains are fine tuned to egos and personalities, agree with your argument on what we should strive towards. Personally I think mining BCH when BTC is more profitable is bad.
  378d
I wish CSW was Satoshi. I wanted to believe... But listening to him speak - especially "answering" questions - it's pretty evident he barely know what hes talking about.
  377d
How could someone prove that they are not a troll? If you can, then you can make a market for outing trolls instead of, you know, assassinating people.
  366d
One thing I don't understand is why don't we let the miners vote like Core did with Segwit?
  366d
Miners are going to vote. Now that there are multiple implementations, its going to work just like originally intended.
  366d
  366d
ABC is pretty desperate to push these changes that haven't even been tested according to ABC's own quality standards. What does that tell anyone with half a brain?