Topic - #IgnoreTheSILENTSAMTroll

Back to topics Threads

1286d
When I post links to scientific studies, I'm "pushing conspiracy theories" because the titles are misleading, and, "It's a conspiracy theory to claim there is hidden knowledge"
1286d
Gene therapy, I'm not even gonna debate that with you. Deny it all you want. Just like the outdated fact checkers. Calling gene therapy a conspiracy theory only proves my point.
1286d
1286d
"You are claiming that powerful companies/people are conspiring to hurt people with an unsafe vaccine." I'm not CLAIMING. I posted a link to a group of LAWYERS and EXPERTS who are.
1286d
Under the auspices of a judge from Portugal. Posting these links here is not "pushing conspiracy theories" or "making claims".
https://grand-jury.net/
1286d
No, when you link blogs you push conspiracy theories. When you push studies to back your claims you show you only read the titles and not the studies which are debunking your claim
1286d
mRNA vaccines are vaccines. Trying to call them gene therapies is an absurd conspiracy theory. Your only evidence is wild bloggers making claims from their moms basements.
1286d
You have only posted links to absurd blogs claiming that experts and lawyers are making these claims. You've shown no evidence the vaccines are unsafe. Just blogs and opinions.
1286d
What is the point of that "court of public opinion" link? Do you think these embarassing links are making your argument credible?
1286d
"When you link blogs you push conspiracy theories". Ok I think I got about everything I said confirmed now by SILENTSAM the sociopath.
1284d
Troll distraction: The accusation is that I framed a news article to make it look sinister.
https://memo.cash/post/666c9edd8e6d1df7256aebdea13720fbea2009bfb08e58b4ca2086067bab2e3d
1284d
Seriously tho this is hilarious to read back 😂
Desperate troll tactics to say posting links is equal to making claims.
Just so you can ignore and distract from the real issues.
1282d
He seems to be convinced he can decide when my posts are claims. Which are then supposedly debunked by all the studies I have linked in various topics. It's hilarious.
1282d
1281d
I learned something today. Debating SILENTSAM is easy, all you have to do is debunk his ad hominem attacks and he will start to self-defeat himself 👽
1281d
1280d
It is interesting that when I show clear evidence against conspiracy theories you guys call it an ad hominem attack, and do so within an ad hominem attack topic.
1279d
As it is I am the one who doesn't simply resort to ad hominem in these discussions. Each of you guys just get irrational when your claims are debunked.
1279d
You attack Medical professionals, lawyers, scientists, journalists, etc. Then act like the ones who share their views are the ones making claims.
1279d
You hate your former self so much that you project your split personality on others when they don't fit the narrative. Claims everywhere, you make false assumptions and accusations
1279d
A generation of SILENTSAM Bots is hanging upon us like a necklace of corpses.
1267d
How "the science" cult members dismiss VAERS data analysis

https://memo.cash/post/e687801de4aaf408ad7753a090e3cde037bee66831262f4df6c663bbcfd7ff08
1180d
I was recently observing posts where a radical feminist was verbally attacked by a trans activist. It was pretty insane, and it reminded me of SilentSAM' troll arguments 👽
1144d
BitcoinNational seems to be the main bot account spamming the propaganda for the gullible.
1138d
Also,VAERS doesn't have any data. They are just a place to make reports for all medical issues soon after vaccination. Later studies decide if they were related.
1138d
Considering VAERS has gun shot to the chest listed under possible vaccine injury just goes to show how little a report on VAERS matters as a source of data.