372d
Dixnorkel is correct that the real thing to argue about is how the government responded to the attack. Yes it was used as an excuse for unjust wars for sure. The attack itself was real though.
372d
I tend to argue most about conspiracies I believed until I looked into them more. Mostly christianity, 911, and climate change. I once believed that climate change was a hoax, or in god.
372d
Now I know all of that is plain bullshit meant to make people easier to categorize and control.
372d
It is easier to control people by making them distrust the system. It often makes it so you do not vote, or participate in society in any way that can influence it.
372d
"Most never hear the official story" lol. That I will not argue against, but only because it is obviously wrong, and I know what happens when I argue such things with YOU-SHOULD-BE-SILENT-SAM.
372d
The rest is almost as bad argumentation. For example, he cannot know there is no god, nobody can.
370d
You shouldn't talk about peoples ability to argue if you are going to demand them to prove a negative statement. It kind of shows you have no idea how a proper argument is formed.
370d
My point is that conspiracy theorists talk about the official report without ever having seen the official report
370d
Again, absolute logic failure. If someone in the audience wants to know what failure this was, ask, and I can explain. SILENTSAM is not honest, he is just trying to bait me into a mud fight
370d
Many victims inside the building when the planes hit report hearing/experiencing multiple explosions. There are videos of debris falling from the building and exploding in midair. Inside. Job.
370d
I am sure there was a lot of panicking and confusion within the building at the time. If you take audio from inside the tower during the collapse you can tell that it was not a demolition.
356d
356d
That video is full of bullshit. They pretend the damage was not significant. They ignore the first ten seconds of the towers collapse. These guys are either idiots, or intentionally misleading.
255d
167d
161d
Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth are already debunked. The towers were not brought down by demolition. The collapse of the three towers are easily explained by the videos.
159d
The controlled demolition of building 7 is the most significant evidence of an inside job. The deniers can't really explain it so it's often ignored.
158d
Building 7 is easily explained, and I have debunked it here already. These guys edit out and deny the first tend second of the collapse of Building 7. It was torn out by tower debris and leaning.
158d
There was no controlled demolitions involved in any of the towers. Building 7 had its mechanical suite fall through and hollow out the last of the building right before the final collapse.
158d
You see the back walls collapse ten seconds after the mechanical suite collapse. That was not the entire collapse in the end. That was the last of the collapsing structure
158d
158d
While we are at it. Let's repeat how the towers were not demolition. Their collapse explained by the video footage of the collapse.
132d
131d
Yet America will never go after Saudia Arabia as they are too important in keeping the American dollar in demand.
82d
79d
Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth are a group of either idiots, or willful liars making up absurd accusation, and not doing any math as math debunks the Truther aims.