electroncash.de is now running Bitcoin ABC 0.20.5
Not sure I would ever support an implementation where
#2MegSechet decides the direction.
agree 100% my confidence is in the devs
What devs?
#2MegSechet and his gang who have been operating just like the Coretard devs lately? (denying issues flat out and avoiding any responsibility for fuck ups?).
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/d1bjxl/deadalnix_has_unfollowed_rogerkver_sad_theres_a/
😮😮i wonder what happened....
Based on
#2MegSechet's track record so far, I predict that he will always be the source of toxicity as long as ABC has most of the network share.
This is just comical:
People started to debunk all the fucking nonsense
#2MegSechet is spreading in this video and the uploader quickly disabled the comment section.
#BitcoinABC #Losers
Bitcoin must have capacity that far exceeds current demand.
Otherwise big fish may run tests that look a lot like the weekend stress test and conclude, 'It's not ready yet'.
BCH adoption won't necessarily be gradual
I may have missed the discussion, I just saw the one, where lead dev said: "Updating the software doesn't revert your previous config back to 2MB." which is true.
Care to link?
"It's not shameful, there is not actual demand for anywhere close to 2MB." -
#2MegSechet
I updated my full node Docker container to work with ABC v0.20.0:
https://github.com/christroutner/docker-abc
Currently looking into ways to avoid rejecting 1 sat/byte txs in spurious fee markets like yesterday.
People didn't call Maxwell "1MegGreg" until the cap caused serious problems
You're whining about Amaury over an adjustable softcap that pools forgot to change lol. You are *drunk*
Look at
#2MegSechet's responses. He flat out declined that the issue exists.
I know a group of devs where Sechet would fit in perfectly.
