I think BSV needs to out compete coins in its range, like Litecoin, Dash, Monero, before thinking of competing with the big boys, BCH, ETH, BTC.
My answer was implicit. No big business worth mentioning yet. But I m preparing and help paving the roads now that there is a roadmap for stable clean and scalable Bitcoin protocol.
Large businesses used to accept bitcoin: Microsoft, Dell, Steam, Virgin and more...
High fees and 1 mb limit killed it...
Newegg and Overstock accepts BCH - pretty large
For the retards who still support the BSV farce:
"Piling every proof-of-work quorum system in the world into one dataset doesn't scale" - Satoshi Nakamoto
Hint: Satoshi is right in this case.
Memo still appears to be bad at reducing inputs over time. Made a withdraw the other day and Electron Cash took like 3 minutes to include all 83 inputs from various tips etc. I just wish this could be automated.
It's a p2p payment system.
So we're in agreement. Thank you. Silly me though: I just realized Ed is pro-BSV and you might be too. Carry on boys.
Anarcho-cap system? It's a p2p digital cash payment system.
Ran out of characters. It's a currency based on the philosophy of Anarcho Capitalism (no dependence on a central entity)
In the year 2020 I will give you the same amount of Satoshis you give this post. Remind me in 2020 and I WILL give you back those Satoshis.
They are pushing the society into chaos and endless wars & people are starting to push back. Capitalism will collapse eventually, only problem is these fucks won't go down peacefully.
I wish the community could crowdfund you a proper education in economics, Ed. Your current understanding is so misled I'm surprised you found your way to BCH, an anarcho-cap system.
I'm not sure but on bitcoinSV we can add more data in OP_RETURN and therefore post longer message on memo I think. Could be pretty cool
OP_RETURN wasn't part of Satoshi's original vision, they should delete it.
You really think 128 MB blocks are the end?
It certainly is without software optimization such as Graphene and CTOR.
What is that computer in the background? Which museum?
Apple I, 1976. Blockchain industry is at the stage of history of computer industry.
What is that computer in the background? Which museum?
That's the new Antminer yo
Why is it that the community that truly understands bitcoin is so small.
I wonder the same thing every time I read your posts.
"Coingeek is trying to hype the SV price for their fake "scaling Bitcoin conference" this week. I'm fairly impressed with the amount of absolutely 100% false information they've been able to assemble into a grand
BSV suffers from mining centralisation. It requires you to trust Coingeek. Therefore BSV is the weakest form of Bitcoin.
Who said it's over, there is no replay protection yet (or I missed that)
It doesn't matter. They are two different entities now with different ticker symbols and different coins. I doubt either will add replay protection.
We know each other from the early days of memo and we know we aren't sock puppets. I see that ABC creates checkpoints and rents hash, while nChain is mining on the original protocol.
Calvin rented hash as well. Also SV is definitely not the original protocol. You've been fooled.
Classic NPC focused on the personality of ONE GUY. This is about the consensus rules. The performance issues can be worked on independently without any hardforks EVER.
Yes because one guy owns it. That's the CSW chain. The guy creating money for the world with 400 patents purpose is just to sue everybody. That's why he will mine at 0 for years.
Look at the bigger picture. BCH community will win. When one finally adds replay protection we will have 1 of each. Both of these are better than BTC, ETH, or LTC.Both will survive. $$
BSV won't survive. It's an attack coin, a killer chain. It was created to conquer an existing coin and as such didn't have any support from any legit exchange.
