Pham Nuwen

Joined Aug 31, 2018

Semper libertatem defendendam.

Mute
1PfHNB1k1Bb7aB7Eb4ScXS6XdSpW7tEE6x
Actions 267
Following 10
Followers 17
Topics following 12
Muted 0
Is Muted By 0

replied 1994d
Really. Suppose you have a hardware store. A known serial domestic abuser walks in and tries to buy an axe. Do you let him?
replied 1994d
Natural is not the same as good, or healthy, or sane.
How dare you suggest that all people with cavities are criminals!? /s
replied 1994d
Then it shouldn't be called private property. It's more like a rental really.
replied 1994d
Do you think people are going to trade and interact equally with violent criminals as with peaceful people?
replied 1994d
This theory negates the idea of private property.
replied 1994d
I'm arguing that violent criminals have mental issues. You are turning it around and trying to make it seem like I claim all people with mental issues are criminals. This is not cool.
replied 1994d
Unprovoked aggression is going to make it difficult to participate in society... Yes, crime is a choice. Why do people make that choice?
replied 1994d
Taxation is theft.
replied 1994d
You are the one introducing the concept of a global constitutional government. Do you know what you mean by that or not?
replied 1994d
I've never said that most mentally ill people are violent. Why are you making things up? Do you really think assaulting people at random is sane?
replied 1994d
In what way am I trying to demonize the mentally ill? If unprovoked aggression is not a sign of mental issues then the definition needs to change. What is your definition?
replied 1994d
Would it restrict national governments from stealing from their people?
replied 1994d
Then you need to outline exactly in what ways the constitution would constrain majority rule (or whatever you mean by "democracy").
1995d · Music
Lynyrd Skynyrd - Free Bird
replied 1995d
"Comments are disabled for this video." lol
replied 1995d
Offering someone a job is such brutal exploitation.
replied 1995d
Hey! Something I agree with LightRider on. Must be a cold day in hell.
replied 1995d
So the global government could only act with force against national governments and not against individuals?
replied 1995d
What absurd example? Majority rule is majority rule, unless constrained by something else. It doesn't *always* result in slavery obviously.
replied 1995d
I'm not demonizing the mentally ill. I'm well aware that you can have mental problems without committing crimes.
replied 1995d
If you commit real crimes, like theft, assault, rape, murder, you have serious mental/behavioral issues. Whether all criminals qualify according to some DSM manual isn't that relevant.
replied 1996d
I think you have to make up your mind. Either one of the global government or the nation state needs to have final say.
replied 1996d
Majority rule (democracy) means enslavement if the majority says so. YouTube and Vimeo doesn't have to be at war to compete.
replied 1996d
It's punishment too, but one of the points (maybe the main point) of prison (or forced psychological care) is to remove people with irrational (insane), destructive behaviour from soc.
replied 1996d
Violent criminals are usually removed from society, for good reason.