standardize and improve practices of commits, prs, and maintaining original authors across chains/projects.
Being more thorough and aiming to be the level of quality that you would
expect at PayPal or Facebook or otherwise is a good idea. Treating everything like a hackathon project isn’t scalable long term.
Are those involved in bchn not able to see his criticism and take it as motivation to clean your room? Rather than seeing it as an attack on bchn, why not see it as good feedback to
standardize and improve practices of commits, prs, and maintaining original authors across chains/projects.
Being more thorough and aiming to be the level of quality that you would
Mr Vermorel picks out two merge commits (!) from BCHN's GitLab version control history to demonstrate that he does not understand how merge commit history works in GitLab.
He is right about one thing.
Are those involved in bchn not able to see his criticism and take it as motivation to clean your room? Rather than seeing it as an attack on bchn, why not see it as good feedback to
Can we not mention utxos and bytes transferred sticky at the bottom of the web application? I’m sure it’s useful data for a few developers interested in how it’s built. But I
don’t see how it serves people just wanting to post and read.
The new member design is so good! Loving the updates! Would be great to get user avatars added!
Can we not mention utxos and bytes transferred sticky at the bottom of the web application? I’m sure it’s useful data for a few developers interested in how it’s built. But I
Just chiming in to say great work on the new theme. Actually appears to be a usable Reddit alternative at this point.
When can we convince the autists on /r/btc to sperg out here and