Joined Jul 04, 2018

Profile not set


Legacy Address: 1Mx7TyeEjPxqnRtDiNFfVWCEKcT7pSx67W
Actions 654
Following 17
Followers 27
Topics following 7
Muted 5
Is Muted By 0

replied 23h
Telegram asks for a phone number. A NoGo for many.
replied 2d
replied 2d
replied 6d
The current version of Wallet supports SLP tokens
9d ·
Absolutely excellent, thanks for this.
replied 7d
If possible: Make the size of the queue somewhat relative to the size of the buses, so that you have an idea of how mant busses are neede to empty the queue.
replied 9d
Love it! I think the tutorial for new users will be extremely helpful, a few people who I've showed txstreet didn't understand what they were looking at initially. Great work!
The CSW/Kleiman trial is starting to resemble Brexit; Craig Wright has been given a deadline of February 11th to produce the required documentation. The judge should, I believe, render a verdict shortly aftet
replied 13d
What would victory mean though?
sent 1 🍺 to
sent 66,931 HONK to
sent 300 SOUR to
replied 15d
cigarettes now).
replied 15d
salary on cigarettes but on vacations doesn't mean that cigarette companies pay your vacations (no matter that the cigarette industry might shrink a tiny bit because you buy less
replied 15d
payments, and all the BCH users get degraded security.
* Not spending them on security doesn't mean it's miners that pay for our development. The same way that not spending your
replied 15d
minting new coins, thus devaluating all the existing coins.
* Spending them on development means less money for hashing, meaning that miners will do less work for the lowered
replied 15d
situation, may be a better use of them.

So, what I'd like to argue is that the money for the fund will come from the BCH holders and no one else:

* The money still comes from
replied 15d
go for development. So, the coins that are minted every block remain the same, but some amount of them don't go for security anymore. It goes for development, which, in the current
replied 15d
devaluation of their coins, because it's been there since the Bitcoin start.


Now, about the dev fund proposal.

The proposal is that a percent of the block reward is shifted to
replied 15d
security, we pay with newly minted coins. This coin minting increases the supply and thus devalues the previously existing coins a bit. **Holders of BCH** know about this coming
replied 15d
network to be popular enough that it can get enough revenue from transacting users. Thus, the minting schedule.

So, let's recap. Until we have enough transaction fees to pay for
replied 15d
money, so to be willing to spend the electricity, you will want to be paid. The end-game is security being paid off by transaction fees. For this to be applicable though, we need the
replied 15d
* of the chain. Bootstraping security is needed, because security is achieved by mining - computers spending electricity to do work and make the chain hard to reorg. Electricity costs
replied 15d
not be even though - it started from 50 coins per block and halves every 4 years.

This, according to Satoshi, is done to fairly distribute the coins and **to bootstrap the security*