|ermore, I recommend that if you have re-used your Memo password on another site, you should change that password on the other sites.
I'll update as I learn more.
probably also if you have used your private key to log on to member
That is, new money would enter the game and pump the value of their holdings by proxy. Feeling secure is a precursor, that’s why the mainstream is trading options instead of buying.
Well it's an experiment that I've been willing to trust people at their word. So far only Sour has kept it. Being hacked isn't an excuse - it's the same one Vidteks used.
TLDR: My stake will drop to 10% over the course this year - increasing the cash back to holders.
People buying on market should be able to tell at what price they will at least get their initial buy price back + extra over time - then it can be treated like a bond
They're two separate chains, two separate tokens, diverged from the same root - the same as BCH and BCHA. So you could consider it SOUR & SOURA. They'll have some different apps avail.
And now there is BCHA and BCHB - which is my point. You're following one and not the other. But you'll never read this because you unfollowed me. I'm done here - I won't be buying more
So do we have 3 sour tokens now? Are they all supported? Or just the Amaury one? They are all equally valid - right? This is exactly what I was talking about.
PS: no minting baton means nothing when supply can triple overnight
So do we have 3 sour tokens now? Are they all supported? Or just the Amaury one? They are all equally valid - right? This is exactly what I was talking about.
It's the same token ID, the same token, split across chains. It exists already whether people want it to or not. It's your choice to claim. Yeah, it doesn't have much available yet.
Given other forks in future are certain - this is an unsustainable way of resolving this problem. This is the only token (to my knowledge) taking this approach, and I can't support it