The thing I like most about Memo is that it makes the trolls face the dilemma of letting discussion go uninterrupted here or increase the usage of BCH.
The cons of BTC are: 1 In order to use LN, you must at least open a channel which can incur a large start up fee. 2 You must securely manage a node which involves having a hot wallet with API access, or hire this
BCH is amaury's pet-project; in the end & when it matters it will go his way over what 'community' wishes
Besides that. You're just being dishonest. It is NOT just Amaury's pet project, but yea he puts a lot of work into it. That is how it goes. Some talk, some do.
//
also to me it seems obvious that amaury doesn't trust miners, so PoS direction makes sense
why are SV supporters always saying that BCH will be proof-of-stake, when noone in the community wants this and never talked about PoS at all? Jimmy is spreading propaganda there.
Look man, BCH isn't going PoS, and if it does, I'll jump off that bandwagon and switch to either XMR or BSV if there is good support. But until then, BCH is definitely the best choice.
I failed to read your first post, I am in total agreement with you now that I read.
2) .. or staying on the pre PoS fork (still POW) BCH chain.
Look man, BCH isn't going PoS, and if it does, I'll jump off that bandwagon and switch to either XMR or BSV if there is good support. But until then, BCH is definitely the best choice.
Because optimizations are centraly planned by devs and applied to everyone on the protocol level.
BSV goes on the path where individual miners try to outcompete others by optimizing.
All development is centrally planned. Also, ABC's roadmap will create a coin so much faster than BSV, then we'll see which coin out competes the other ;)