homopit

Joined May 02, 2018

Profile not set

Mute
qz7jpp4a0hjh5xyeu9xefcfaa79mm0preq4j3ptqca  

Legacy Address: 1JF1gE3a8SXG3jZWfzxHavRnt8eCQEbYHT
simpleledger:qz7jpp4a0hjh5xyeu9xefcfaa79mm0preqef667qxr
Actions 3,327
Following 35
Followers 107
Topics following 3
Muted 1
Is Muted By 3

replied 2h
Tek
It IS performing better than the old one. But hashrate fluctuations will always be there as long as BCH is a minority hash chain. BTC just experienced a staggering 8,8% diff. increase.
3h
Bitcoin cash is not something new, satoshi write about it back a decade ago when he release the white paper.
homopit
replied 3h
Yes, Satoshi raised this idea: ""I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume."
voted Has not. Accept, and let it go. 3h
1DaRZNJysXHLfJDx
created poll 3h
Has the American Election been illegally manipulated.
100% has 1 votes (1 unique) · 0 satoshis
Must examine the system up close. 0 votes (0 unique) · 0 satoshis
Has not. Accept, and let it go. 1 votes (1 unique) · 0 satoshis

Results

homopit
replied 7h
homopit
replied 23h
I liked his post 70 times ;) Tried to hit the 50 unconfirmed tx limit, but then it hit me that I have dozens of different UTXOs on memo.
replied 1d
homopit
Yes, unfortunately. The price of BCH should be $3000, then the hashrate would be higher and the block times more regular.
homopit
replied 1d
Yes. But the problem is, miners create situations like this to exploit DAA - switch to other chains, wait diff to drop, then 'en-masse' switch back. BCH has low steady hashrate.
homopit
replied 1d
You can't expect that this won't occur. BCH's hashrate is so (soooooo) small that slight switching of it has big consequences.
homopit
replied 1d
And it is still more profitable to mine BCH. There should have been even more blocks.
homopit
replied 1d
This DAA is not designed to produce constant block times. There will always be variance. With miners switching even more. This DAA is not oscillatory, last one was.
homopit
replied 1d
Tek
homopit
replied 1d
subreddits don't have 'shadow-banning' powers, only reddit admins. If you are shadow-banned, it's for reddit, not for subreddit.
voted No 1d
created poll 1d
Are you a robot yet?
Yes 4 votes · 0 satoshis
No 9 votes · 555 satoshis
Maybe 1 votes · 0 satoshis
Can You Repeat The Question? 1 votes · 0 satoshis

Results

replied 2d
True. But as long as they are willing to burn money on what is essentially not just a 51% attack, but 95% attack they pretty much control the chain.
replied 4d
community
I always thought fees are going to Satoshi Nakamoto's Swiss bank account. Isn't it?
replied 4d
community
I always thought fees are going to Satoshi Nakamoto's Swiss bank account. Isn't it?
replied 4d
community
I always thought fees are going to Satoshi Nakamoto's Swiss bank account. Isn't it?
replied 4d
community
I always thought fees are going to Satoshi Nakamoto's Swiss bank account. Isn't it?
replied 4d
community
I always thought fees are going to Satoshi Nakamoto's Swiss bank account. Isn't it?
replied 4d
community
I always thought fees are going to Satoshi Nakamoto's Swiss bank account. Isn't it?
replied 4d
community
I always thought fees are going to Satoshi Nakamoto's Swiss bank account. Isn't it?
replied 4d
community
I always thought fees are going to Satoshi Nakamoto's Swiss bank account. Isn't it?
replied 4d
community
I always thought fees are going to Satoshi Nakamoto's Swiss bank account. Isn't it?
tipped 1,000 RKT 🚀 1d
replied 4d
community
I always thought fees are going to Satoshi Nakamoto's Swiss bank account. Isn't it?