Rozjemca35

Joined Apr 15, 2018

Profile not set

Mute
qz7zt2htj2n42xs46gv8h2lf3779nvt835p2svh6d8  

Legacy Address: 1J9qAG1ef8eZz6R2De14KkEUWEcQmjC49p
simpleledger:qz7zt2htj2n42xs46gv8h2lf3779nvt835d3mhz6ne
Actions 765
Following 22
Followers 30
Topics following 2
Muted 0
Is Muted By 0

replied · 223d
My life is so miserable... I wish I received more likes. ☹️😩
Well memo should work on onboarding more people. Not sure if there is any incentive for them to do it though.
what if you are wrong?
replied · 232d
It is planned to support profile images that are stored on-chain.
@memo could you add support for this long image links as profile pictures? https://static.bitcoinfiles.org/c23c3e2e1474d4c01741911e3317e6c00c861ed15f41da82e8a5561542342f7e
replied · 254d
Hashwar ended, so they were turned off.
No, we want bitcoin that is unbounded, that scales, that can be stable base for the real crypto revolution. Why do you even care about SV at this point? Go BCHing somewhere else :p
No more splits means BSV will do well. Three camps: BTC small blocks, no HF; BCH medium blocks, experimental protocol 6 mo HFs; BSV stable protocol, massive blocks.
and a 100MB block as a birthday gift ;)
Other coins either are anti state, anti law, anti scale or anti people - scams. Without working within law there wont be state adoption. Without scale there wont be corp.adoption
Bsv will succeed because of the economics behind it and working within existing laws. It benefits companies, honest states and people. Its win win win.
Obviously Roz. Im just pointing out Sams lack of logic and IQ. Its a common theme in anti-SV'ers that needs to be called out publicly.
Avalanche aka proof of stake pre consensus junk? It seems like good idea but it isnt. Ask Ryan today what he thinks about it.
CSW is major part of Satoshi group. (Incl Dave Kleiman). Only retards dont see it and noone cares if they dont see that. In the end, its their loss.
replied · 266d
Great idea for a centrally planed miners uncompetitive socialist coin.
replied · 266d
No it has some issues. It changes the "incentives of bitcoin", it changes how bitcoin works, it's not necessary, and some others things
Amaury explains it better and simpler:"Basically, it is like Ripple" RIP
replied · 265d
A recent interview on youtube. >> actuallly, you should know: https://memo.cash/post/7b2784bd0191b62a7182ffd37dd41fa107f6508d58306cf6031888ac649bb29b
Let's wait and see. What if they do mine 128 or 512 next year? That it was fake? It doesnt count? Just curious.
This can be said about 99% of coins... including btc and bch.
Wondering if bitmain is pumping before q4 ends?
replied · 276d
There are to many idiots that don't understand the bitcoin whitepaper and what it offers. This is why we have shitcoins and stupid changes forced into protocol. BSV needs to win.
replied · 276d
Who is then censoring BSV point of view on r/BTC and hates CSW? isn't it happening? BTW there can be only ONE coin, only with one it really makes sense.
replied · 276d
Either you are bitcoin maximalist or a shitcoiner. There is no reason to have more than one global coin. If you support more, you are against crypto.