Most of what he posts is lies about the definitions, and lies about the stats. The only posts that are not lies misrepresent the facts.
With so many conflicts of interest and so much freedom at stake I’d prefer to second guess everything pushed by the establishment. Same as global warming.
choose to tip someone else who already has a list of muted people or who has sorted through posts and presented me with the most relevant, interesting, cool, etc.
I ought to be free to choose this ‘mod’ and leave them for a different ‘mod’ at any time. This would keep them honest & their interests aligned with mine.
Haha love the passion. I also hate censorship. That’s why I think we need a uncensorable base layer but I dont want to have to mute everyone myself. I’d prefer to
choose to tip someone else who already has a list of muted people or who has sorted through posts and presented me with the most relevant, interesting, cool, etc.
Sorry for being rude I am passionate about the censorship thing.
Haha love the passion. I also hate censorship. That’s why I think we need a uncensorable base layer but I dont want to have to mute everyone myself. I’d prefer to
> choose a mod to filter posts for you
Actually I think this is the model of the future. Delegated moderation. Lat anyone speak and let me pay someone to mute antivaxxer shit.
Mods do keep out spam tho. Would be cool to allow all posts (like on memo) then be able to choose a mod to filter posts for you. (e.g. things you agree with, challenge you, etc.)
If they no longer filter how you want you could go to a competing mod. & on a platform like memo they could be paid for their efforts.
Whenever you give someone power they will most likely abuse it, that is why moderators are a bad idea.
Mods do keep out spam tho. Would be cool to allow all posts (like on memo) then be able to choose a mod to filter posts for you. (e.g. things you agree with, challenge you, etc.)
Have you tried "member" yet? Its like memo meets reddit and so far its looking very promising. With all the censorship going on, Reddit's days are numbered.
Try member at:
https://memberapp.github.io/
do you promote member on more mainstream sites? I've found it difficult to get people to switch/try/or care about actual censorship resistant sites
So its pretty easy to see what happened at yesterdays conference...companies like the idea of blockchain, but simply want to do their own version
Is this because they need/want functions that current chains do not have? or current chain protocols are not stable enough? or because they want centralized control over the chain?
still cant stand this youtuber but pete being a "boomer's version of an ideal millenial" and Bernie being a "millenial's version of an ideal boomer" is pretty spot on.
The utxo is spent without the op return data so the tokens get burnt. Simpleledger.info shows token burns, though sometimes not immediately because of slpdb being laggy.
thanks, was under the impression that burning just meant sending to an address with an unknown private key.
Knowing is not enough we must apply , whilling is not enough we must do - Bruce lee
I've seen this quote attributed to Leonardo da Vinci and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. Cant wait for everything to be anchored on-chain so we can have proper attribution.
Man, I'm getting too many unsolicited shit-tokens. I had been returning them to sender. Is there a token burn address somewhere?
why not just let them accumulate? Making it tough to find the ones you want or you just don't like looking at them? (I've given up trying to know what they're all for.)