The solutions seems very simple. Drop support for unified coin, and start supporting Bitcoin Cash (BCH) again. As soon as somebody send everybody 1 sat
ABC have basically shat the bed with horrendous misconduct the last few days... that will be very hard to clean. Shit stains alllll over that ABC blockchain..
The solutions seems very simple. Drop support for unified coin, and start supporting Bitcoin Cash (BCH) again. As soon as somebody send everybody 1 sat
Dude you're one of the few people on memo.cash that even support ABC. Stop pretending like it's all over after 24 hours. Even memo.cash are more neutral to SV oriented.
and I predict after BSV is dead they will go back to Bitcoin Core, where they belong. Ryan X Charles? No, more like Ryan ○ Charles. Full Circle.
Wow. Really? Shitting on Ryan X Charles already - because he chose SV? Pathetic. Listen to yourself
If SV win this... they'll be able to follow it up with frequent block size changes too and if other miners don't keep up then they die
I hope SV wins the hash battle. Will be so much better in the long run.
ABC is the biggest threat to BTC - with ABC's upgrade BCH will make BTC look like a sad joke.
Wrong. ABC is the biggest attack on BCH yet. SV is the correct path
Would this require a change in the BCH protocol?
..."carrier transactions"... which is fine and should be able to be implemented I would think... but it would complicate things somewhat (I would imagine).
Would this require a change in the BCH protocol?
As far as I know... transactions with multiple OP_RETURNs in one transaction are considered "non-standard" by miners and are not relayed at present... would thus need to do multiple..
fighting in favour of some common rules unless they seem FAIR and JUST... voluntaryism meets these criteria... No other set of basic rules (laws) has a hope in hell for 100% unanimous agreement.
universalisable set of rules that is simultaneously objective (can't just have arbitrary or particularisable rules) and agreeable... i.e. there's no point in trying to convince people to stop with the
Some are better looking, funnier, more charismatic... some people have parents who are all of these things and love and care... others are not so fortunate... this is life... voluntaryism is the only
Either way... by restrictive co-op ONLY arrangements or by free market voluntaryism, you end up with inequalities in every facet of life because people are not equal. Some are faster, smarter, stronger.
That just doesn't suit everybody... in fact... when you let people freely choose... most people prefer to keep their fixed labour $$ entirely separate from investment $$.
regime to maintain... I want you to really think about this please... this is a big one. I'm not strawmanning. I know what you're thinking of with arrangements where everyone shares an equal stake
(As you are suggesting)... coops like you're suggesting is fine but if you restrict everybody's options to ONLY co-op arrangements... this would be very damaging and would require an authoritarian
now unable to pay your rent etc... feed your kids... Maybe I do want to own shares / equity and take risk... but maybe I don't want to have ALL of my $$ invested ONLY in the particular place that I work
The reason most people don't freely choose coops over more conventional arrangements (in general) is because it sure would suck to work for the whole year but if the business makes a net loss... you are
You realise that "workplace democracy" also known as "Co-ops" are just a subset of capitalism right? Where people sovereign over their own body and property to trade their labour as they see fit...
BitcoinXio is anonymous and all we know is that he definitely treats SV-supporters differently than ABC supporters
What is veiled censorship? As long as mod logs are open and I can read downvoted content I'm okay
This guys? Professor of economic Richard Wolf? Mate, everything being said in that video/interview is 100% correct.
You're prepared to defend Labour Theory of Value? That is an utterly indefensible position. We've known this since what? At least the early 1950s!
And so we need to move forward, until there is enough distance and their lies can no longer be heard.Those who are in to the movement know exactly what I am talking about.
CTOR - I don't care that much but given that there are no clear performance benefits at least not right now and not for a very long time to come... I think ABC should back off.
And so we need to move forward, until there is enough distance and their lies can no longer be heard.Those who are in to the movement know exactly what I am talking about.
Accept the two new op codes + DSV + the "miner's choice" user interface... just change default setting on BSV back to 32mb (it's just a default setting - made easy to change on BSV)
And so we need to move forward, until there is enough distance and their lies can no longer be heard.Those who are in to the movement know exactly what I am talking about.
Sounds like a big long strawman against BSV... I personally think that either BSV or ABC will be just fine... It's just big egos and power plays... Really what should happen is:
This discrepancy is getting worse.
what is going on here? I don't get it
This is actual truth about Capitalism:
Oh please. This guy subscribes to the Labour Theory of Value for Christ Sakes.
