Joined Mar 09, 2019

Come meet me at a Hub Pub. I'm lonely.


Legacy Address: 1DSBRL9Lg6hHDW7uaUnSuYixwQoKAJK4Qo
Actions 85
Following 2
Followers 6
Topics following 0
Muted 0
Is Muted By 0

replied · 12d
If that's the case, then you best be a communist.
replied · 12d
nChain likes to work with companies by providing dev support tied to shitty legal terms. Zealots in the target org suck and sell that knob really hard for CSW's sweet treats.
replied · 120d
Craig sure had a lot to say and nothing to talk about. It'd have read better if it had actually designed bitcoin as well.
replied · 136d
Durr durr, you have to watch 10,000 hours of Jordan Peterson's work to truly understand his work. Nurr nurr, you have to watch 10,000 hours of shitead CSW's work to understand his work
replied · 136d
A fool who doesn't understand socialism, communism, marx, smith, or any other philosophy. Also a fraud to boot.
replied · 140d
I agree, but for a business that is relying on information being more or less immediately available from a consistent location, it's kind of an untenable situation. Especially at scale
replied · 144d
It's not about your wallet being unsafe, it's about the data stored and it being reliably available.
replied · 146d
Not running your own node opens you to the risk of having your data up and disappear. Why would you not solve this through a permissioned chain, or just established CSPs.
replied · 146d
It's risky because of the ability to put arbitrary data on the chain, and the fact that nodes can/will prune blocks that are too big/old. Running your own node opens you to risk.
replied · 146d
That sounds like IBM selling off assets to keep their share prices from crumbling. Nothing unusual here.
replied · 156d
Still should have been called the doubloon.
replied · 157d
Is this the reorg problem?
replied · 157d
I wish they'd reorg out the toxic people
replied · 158d
Their roadmap had it and the chief bitcoin Jerry Chan is friends with all of the nchain people always pushing them
replied · 158d
By that principle, then the exchange can delist at will because then they trade what they want to trade? They're not obliged to facilitate trades for any one entity.
replied · 159d
Well, two hours before they officially announced, but the threats were there. What do you think of Ayre's threats that it was unlawful? What about CSW turfing out his twitter?
replied · 160d
Well, in this case "Binance decides that dealing with CSW being a thundercunt isn't worth the money coming in from BSV trades"
replied · 166d
Your understanding of communism is pretty fucking weak if you think a resource based economy is anything akin to it.
replied · 167d
I lost a lot through spending. People on my team would constantly pay me in BCH for food since I was the only one with fiat. Then I started trying to divest because I was holding lots
replied · 167d
Then it was quickly taken over by greed, deceit, and opportunism. Along with that, illegal activities, child abuse, etc. Passions that continue to this day.
replied · 167d
Relevant to whom exactly? It's almost entirely us nerds circle jerking, and some speculators who are looking for sick returns. Those guys would bet on two drops of piss on a urinal.
replied · 167d
Still a scam (mostly), less of a fad?
BSV proponents don't know the different between "forever" and "for a very long time, if we allow it" and why that difference is important.
Every time I see some shithead talking about the "real" bitcoin

replied · 168d
I'll take all your bits. Sponsor my shitposting!