Getting Bitcoin to global adoption has always been a balancing act. Go too far on "no changes" and innovation muscles atrophy - witness BTC meltdown over taproot. Go too far on "fail fast" and BCH will split to death.
We need stakeholder engagement. Asking for the king to do the right thing 1. won't work because there isn't a king or 2. will work and we will have failed because there is a king.
Getting Bitcoin to global adoption has always been a balancing act. Go too far on "no changes" and innovation muscles atrophy - witness BTC meltdown over taproot. Go too far on "fail fast" and BCH will split to death.
Long live the BCH chain without IFP.
member.cash Friday Freeroll - member.cash will be sponsoring a FREE poker tournament this coming Friday! $35 prize fund.
member.cash will stick with the BCHN compatible chain in the upcoming fork
But we are not there yet.
Sorry I got the context of the conversation now! Yes it will be good when we get there but we are not there yet. Mining template service is a good first step.
I hope you're right (no split). But a majority of miners and exchanges will need to switch to BCHN instead of ABC, if BCH is to be saved. Otherwise there will be a split as it looks
Yes we keep moving in the direction we need to go. Remember anyone can split at any time. But if it's worth nothing, nobody calls it a split.
BCHD is also now capable of being used as mining node software. Verde is also trying to become capable. I think it would be ideal if miners would just diversify.
Yes, diversification to such a degree that no node implementation has a super majority.
But we are not there yet.
We are not at global adoption yet either. What is your point? We keep moving toward success.
Perspective that BCH governance is in fact moving forward, not along the ruts of legacy coercive systems, but of evidence, persuasion and collaboration
read.cash/@TomZ/the-story-of-how-bchs-daa-came-to-be-4f57a6e1
No bullshit.
No split.
Why not both.
Make it so, stakeholders. No bullshit, no split. It's a good combo.
Unambiguous statement that aserti3-2d should be implemented and Grasberg should be decisively rejected.
Initial signers:
Cryptophyl
General Protocols
Read.Cash
Software Verde
SpinBCH
Yeah I saw this, that's why I said that a clear statement from economic actors would be a good thing.
lol
I am really worried about the future of Bitcoin Cash right now :(
Maybe this is a necessary step but it's highly unpleasant.
BCH will survive well.
This incident demonstrates how
open discussion can help a community
successfully navigate a crisis.
Success illuminates 'who examines' vs 'who schemes'.
https://read.cash/@GeneralProtocols/joint-statement-on-aserti3-2d-algorithm-a77a9059
Unambiguous statement that aserti3-2d should be implemented and Grasberg should be decisively rejected.
Initial signers:
Cryptophyl
General Protocols
Read.Cash
Software Verde
SpinBCH
- If this does not work out, I would like to see a clear choice by economic actors (businesses, wallets, application developers, exchanges, miners, and so on).
The Bitcoin Cash ecosystem is in the process of making clear what needs to happen in November, and a split is not one of those things.
Thanks! Makes sense it's the Mule. I'm now looking through the weird world of Punchatz... https://gallerix.org/pic/I/2059887502/177842323.jpeg
New random
#memo idea. Instead of boring green memo banner, we have an image. We get to bid sats for what image we want. Dutch auction. Memo dev gets the funds.
This seems to be the cover of Asimov's Foundation and Empire from the 70's.
https://raggedclaws.com/2013/06/19/look-here-a-trio-of-foundation-covers-with-art-by-don-ivan-punchatz/
I assume it represents "The Mule", which is a character in the book.
This seems to be the cover of Asimov's Foundation and Empire from the 70's.
https://raggedclaws.com/2013/06/19/look-here-a-trio-of-foundation-covers-with-art-by-don-ivan-punchatz/
That's right! Thank you for replying to the question.
Hey Memos. Hope you all are doing well. Enjoying the clown show today? We will get through this and while history may rhyme, it may not repeat this time.
Random query. I have always liked your profile pick. Do you have a source for it?
So the statement about the DAA is half-true, it was not technically included, but there was awareness that it was public and published.
And published in a code base that is still very similar to ABC - similar enough that it could more or less be copy pasted.
