100,000 Sats Giveaway - Round 27 The first 10 users to upload a video from the @Bitcoincashpodcast channel, win 10,000 Sats. You must follow me and like this post please #BarrioBitcoin #Memo
Gavin Andresen post from 2010 about communication channels on bitcoin potentially flooding the network with Lady Gaga videos. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=195.msg1613#msg1613
Bigger equal stronger e.g. China, Brasil, India, Russia, USA.
Who says power centralization is not natural haha All social animals rely on who is The strongest to be The Unique leader
Just because centralized power exists doesn't prove power naturally centralizes. I've already given you 3 counter examples.
So You are trying to prove power vacuums don't exist ? Explain yourself ?
Small sovereignties can thrive if they are strong, e.g. Singapore. US spent 20 years in Afghanistan and always struggled to control it. Power centralization isn't a law of nature.
Libertarianism and anarco capitalism can lead to the segregation of nation states into small auto-determined communities creating a power vaccum which lead to the take over of a world goverment .
"Power vacuum" is an excuse used to take control, rather than a natural phenomenon that must occur. Central power can collapse without a replacement, e.g. USSR.
Also, some CHIPS have been rejected by a majority as well. Simple proposals that are not worked through are also rejected.
May I ask why you rejected every sane CHIP?
I reject CHIPs because I don't believe in democracy. I think bitcoin was fine as originally architected. Only changes needed is to increase limits, which miners can do on their own.
Not 100%, but overwhelming majority. Mining is democracy through POW & miners always have the opportunity to reject a CHIP with 51% however they have voted FOR them by running them.
Mining is competition, not democracy. Miners invest in the chain with an expected return. If you think that's the same as people voting I think you've missed the novelty of bitcoin.