BTC is not the gateway to crypto. It is controlled opposition, a false flag of sorts, that sucks resources away from true alternatives to the fiat monetary system.
"Hodl BTC! Not your keys, not your coins!" - If everyone tried to do this and only created a single withdrawal transaction, it would take the BTC network 50 years to process at their cap of 300k transactions per day.
be room for a macroscopic view of things. The science analog I would use to suggest this is Quantum Mechanics vs General Relativity. QM is super accurate for small things.
I agree GR works better for big things and QM better for small. But in the case of economics micro works better for both big and small
While Macro, OTOH, necessarily involves much more psychology, sociology, and other things disciplines that still lack predictive quantitative models (eg, equations that Actually Work)
Microeconomics is real economics. Macroeconomics is made up to imply there's some magical line you cross where it switches from real economics to fantasy economics.
Forces of supply and demand apply no matter how big of an economy you're dealing with. "Macroeconomics" was invented by socialists/Keynesians.
Microeconomics is real economics. Macroeconomics is made up to imply there's some magical line you cross where it switches from real economics to fantasy economics.
If that only means that I can find someone who hosts a node, and he can promise to host it indefinitely but he can still delete it when he wants, then I feel I have been lied to.
Filecoin is built by IPFS team and tries to address the permanence issue.
Oh, sorry about that ambiguity. I ment to inquire about your statement about IPFS. And btw I thought I could "dump" data on the IPFS and have someone else host them.
What do you think about dynamic block sizes? With a fee structure encourage increasing blocksize when it's appropriate to do so, ofc
Not sure what you mean by dynamic block sizes. As you said there will always be some sort of limit. But if people are hitting it then something is wrong IMO.
...BSVs fault was that many services dependent on running own nodes started to fail w. huge blocks. Now it is extreme centralized w. VERY few nodes & hence single points of failure.
Maybe home nodes that aren't doing anything. For miners the increased block size is fairly negligible.