btcfork

Joined Sep 03, 2018

Bitcoin has forked to preserve its quality as "peer-to-peer electronic cash". Forking is a way to upgrade the protocol and resolve contentious disputes.

Mute
qptfelt5jlale5xjcvwuvjrwy9szrxun3clfznfr0q  

Legacy Address: 18tyBMmRzfaZBDndq9rXmYvkJz1Tzqx3on
simpleledger:qptfelt5jlale5xjcvwuvjrwy9szrxun3cnjfgur37
Actions 3,576
Following 132
Followers 181
Topics following 17
Muted 22
Is Muted By 6

9h
10h
我不能代表您接受捐赠,然后让您承担责任 .
11h
If this is proposal could result in divestment by large holders, it is fitting to ask for a coin holder vote on the acceptability of IFP and other proposals.

Too bad voting.bitcoin.com is temporarily offline.
replied 11h
replied 12h
12h
replied 20h
He really gets it to a deep level and is able to explain it well.
replied 21h
He is the one who provided huge donations to developers in the last fundraiser, at least according to his claims. I don't have much reason to doubt it's true.
22h
The unexpected consequence of the new 12.5% development fund proposal will is that everyone is using read.cash!
replied 3d
If you live in a country where the government gives it to people who do a good job, let me know where you live.
I know of two results of where it ends up
- lowest bidder
- cousin/frens
3d
How Bitcoin solves it:
- You earn your money through work, your pay your money to those who you feel provide you a good service.

How governments solve it:
- Take your money, give it to someone they feel should do it.
3d
3d
Update #2 on the Bitcoin Cash Register subtitle translation effort.

https://read.cash/@btcfork/bitcoin-cash-register-subtitle-translation-update-2-7e96bcc1
3d · Bitcoin Cash Register community translations
replied 3d
Thanks a bunch
3d
replied 3d
I agree with you on most points.

However it is not a small detail that miners are redirecting the inflation rather than creating it. Its an important distinction - one changes the
replied 3d
You brought up somewhere else earlier that Bitcoin.com already does this. Which is fine. I have no problem with that.

Bitcoin.com doesn't threaten to orphan other blocks if they don't
replied 3d
1. A few miners colluding to say "follow our rules or we orphan your shit" is very authoritarian.

2. The money going to a sketchy Chinese company first is also bad.
replied 3d
May I ask you to submit a copy of the subtitles text with the changes you propose, via https://glot.io/new/plaintext
I'd like to see your changes in the text so we can review further.
replied 3d
I've read your discussion with sjbuendia on read.cash, ending here: https://read.cash/@sjbuendia/our-bitcoin-cash-journey-199fa04b#comment-c90551b6
3d
I am looking for someone to review a Chinese (traditional) translation of the subtitles: https://glot.io/snippets/fjztom0m8y
3d · Bitcoin Cash Register community translations
I am looking for someone to review a Chinese (traditional) translation of the subtitles: https://glot.io/snippets/fjztom0m8y
4d
Initial take on "dev tax": It is not worth splitting BCH over $6M. The "Miner Activated Soft Fork" is fascinating. It will be a mechanism to effect change in the future. However, this proposal should be repealed.
4d · bitcoin
All BTC in existence