David Shares

Joined Apr 19, 2018

Profile not set

Actions 594
Following 16
Followers 80
Topics following 5
Muted 0
Is Muted By 4

sent 100 HEAD to 440d
sent 50 BAB to 440d
sent 1,000 BCHCOST to 440d
sent 10,020 MEMBER to 440d
sent 21,000,000 JOLLYROGERCASH to 440d
sent 1 MGTOW to 440d
sent 21 CSW-is-Satoshi:) to 440d
sent 225,126,126 WSB to 440d
sent 100 SMART to 440d
sent 100 🍞 to 440d
sent 10 Valentine to 440d
sent 2 🎫 to 440d
accepted link to · 440d
requested link to · 440d
accepted link to · 440d
requested link to · 440d
replied 440d
replied 440d

February 21, 2018: Bitcoin Lightning Fraud? Laolu Is Building a ‘Watchtower’ to Fight It https://www.coindesk.com/laol
replied 440d

January 20, 2018: Lightning Network May Not Solve Bitcoin’s Scaling ‘Trilemma’ https://www.coindesk.co
replied 440d
June 26, 2017: Mathematical Proof That the Lightning Network Cannot Be a Decentralized Bitcoin Scaling Solution https://medium.com/@jonaldfyookball/mathematical-proof-that-the-lightnin
replied 441d
replied 441d

October 29, 2020: PSA: High onchain BTC fees have impact for you Lightning Channels: Pre negotiated fees might not be sufficient for your commitment tx to be included
replied 441d

LND node could be coerced into revealing an invoice preimage for a forwarded HTLC with a colliding payment hash.https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2020-Octob
replied 441d
| could force an lnd node to accept a high-S ECDSA signature when updating new off-chain states. https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2020-October/002858.html
replied 441d
| to Upgrade ASAP https://www.coindesk.com/lightning-vulnerability-ind-node-operators-upgrade-asap

October 21, 2020: Two Lightning Network CVE's were made public:
A malicious peer