BitcoinCash

Joined Apr 15, 2018

Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash - Enabling new economies with low fee micro-transactions, large business transactions, and permissionless spending.

Mute
qqee2y2c5qhkdxx0m7ekyv27udja876ymq8hekg0sj  

Legacy Address: 15hk3CBZXMMCDRdXGzkXiykhUoTXjgauY6
simpleledger:qqee2y2c5qhkdxx0m7ekyv27udja876ymqtvjda0wv
Actions 69
Following 17
Followers 22
Topics following 2
Muted 0
Is Muted By 0

BitcoinCash
replied 176d
changyong
这是昌用老师在上课?
set profile 176d
Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash - Enabling new economies with low fee micro-transactions, large business transactions, and permissionless spending.
set name to BitcoinCash 176d
set name to 176d
BitcoinCash
replied 358d
Is this a 7zip file? I tried to de-compress it but failed.
BitcoinCash
replied 408d
Barricade
yes, pre-consensus make 0-conf more reliable when scaling. Without it, 0-conf just a mess when the network traffic peaking.
BitcoinCash
replied 421d
Well done memo, best wishes, it's time to move on. Both BCH and BSV.
BitcoinCash
replied 422d
POS is not ready, POW is still the best way to achieve decentralized consensus. BCH will never refuse technologies which can make it better. Scaling is the most important thing.
BitcoinCash
replied 423d
I am glad SV forked off. So BCH can focus on become the best money, for everyone daily use.
BitcoinCash
replied 423d
bitcoin runs totally based on software, except the asic miner. upgrade is an easy thing, just change or add a few lines of code will not cause someone lose money.
BitcoinCash
replied 423d
If you take a look on every success technology achievement, no technology lock themself. IP protocol upgrade rarely because it relate to hardware. Incompatible change cause greate lose
BitcoinCash
replied 423d
cbeastsv
If you want 0.1, you should disable p2sh TXs at first. If you do so, most "satoshi" OP_CODEs will be useless.
BitcoinCash
replied 423d
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5944,please stop showing arrogance. There are minor and major changes.
BitcoinCash
replied 423d
cbeastsv
If you think Bitcoin v0.1 can win, just build it. Tell Craig, stop attacking people will make BSV a brighter furture.
BitcoinCash
replied 423d
If you think https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc791 defines IPV4, and that's the base of the internet not including any of the extension/ high level protocols, I am not arguing with you.
BitcoinCash
replied 423d
cbeastsv
Why do you think the ipv6 has never changed by 20 years? Just because the name is still the same?
BitcoinCash
replied 423d
I think BTC is ready for u.
voted BCH 423d
created poll 426d
In the case that Memo only supports one chain, which chain do you prefer?
BCH 59 votes · 12,352 satoshis
BSV 44 votes · 14,121 satoshis

Results

BitcoinCash
replied 423d
cbeastsv
I am using IPV6 daily.
BitcoinCash
replied 423d
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1340,you can find a lot of RFCs in this site, it depends on the definition of "major upgrade", I think BCH is doing what it should to do, for scaling.
BitcoinCash
replied 423d
No, IPV4 is upgrading many times, for the massive adoption, now it is upgrading to IPV6
BitcoinCash
replied 423d
Lock the protocol have no chance to win, even BTC core is seeking ways to upgrade, they choose Segwit, BCH choose big block, SV choose to lock itself.
BitcoinCash
replied 423d
Memo should choose the winner, ABC is the winner obviously.
followed topic stresstestbitcoin.cash 576d
followed topic Photography 589d