Bitcoin Core - Change it into digital gold and charge $50 transaction fees.
Bitcoin SV - Steal Satoshi's coins.
Bitcoin ABC - Pay ourselves 8% of the coinbase.
Bitcoin Cash - Let's just stick to the plan
Isn't ABC just changing emission of new coins without paying themselves ?
You can't do that for LN because you need people private key
And can't do that for bsv because there will be too much data hosted on the chain, would be a nightmare for every nodes
But that was just some random thoughts not so important
Indeed I forgot that. But I guess you'll just have to write on the chain "X has 10spice, Y has 5" (so who has which token) and the token can work on the new chain
You can't do that for LN because you need people private key And can't do that for bsv because there will be too much data hosted on the chain, would be a nightmare for every nodes
Indeed I forgot that. But I guess you'll just have to write on the chain "X has 10spice, Y has 5" (so who has which token) and the token can work on the new chain
Because BSV is a ticking time bomb led by a fraudster with a weird cult like following. I concede it does have better OP_RETURN support. That's not enough though.
Anyway if you just need 2048 just split it into 10op_return tx. I guess it's feasible
Because BSV is a ticking time bomb led by a fraudster with a weird cult like following. I concede it does have better OP_RETURN support. That's not enough though.
Even with a modest increase of OP_RETURN from 220 to 2048, I could have a Reddit style on-chain public discussion platform online - all tied to Memo Identities and the Member Web of Trust. Within a week!
Why don't you build that on bsv ? The opreturn limit is enough
There are multiple apps that have added to the protocol. None have failed or caused frustration afaik.
To the memo protocol ? You are the only one developing it so you are the only one modifying the protocol. I don't think there is an alternative serious site that is a "memo clone"
If I want to add something to the memo protocol (let say private message) and you disagree/dont want to implement it then it'll fail and cause frustration for everyone
It works too with the retweet functionality that is missing here, if only 10% can rt it's weird It's a good thing because the n1 should be the one that decides because who else should
I'm guessing you're not a dev, but just FYI no one controls any protocols. Many apps implement many protocols. This app use Memo, SLP, B://, etc.
If I want to add something to the memo protocol (let say private message) and you disagree/dont want to implement it then it'll fail and cause frustration for everyone
I want a good platform, not something that is "slapped together". I don't really understand your anger when you are free to decide to help or not. Also, memo is not an open protocol.
Memo is an open protocol Dude srsly that's the point of metanet. Everything open so anyone can compete
Mining, nodes, businesses. Everything involving BSV revolves around the nchain-coingeek criminal org.
Anyone can join and mine Anyone can fork their code to create node software that compete with their Not sure what others businesses they have. Patents ? You can do it too And so on ...
They will most certainly offer "shares" of metanet in some way and as any sane person would expect the project will never materialise besides marketing stunts and PR bullshit.
Otherwise I think I agree. Metanet is very high risk high reward project
They will most certainly offer "shares" of metanet in some way and as any sane person would expect the project will never materialise besides marketing stunts and PR bullshit.
What do you mean by "shares" ? It's a decentralized project I don't think they can make money from it because it's just posting txs to the blockchain