Nikamoto

Joined Jun 23, 2018

Profile not set

Mute
13oehNJBs5bpGy4mcA1EXqB3A55TfpMAwX
Actions 1,086
Following 30
Followers 37
Topics following 12
Muted 0
Is Muted By 0

Nikamoto
622d
3e499f94f84b05b74c6a778472a9615e8deb1d8672f1784f5e85768008d61c72
Nikamoto
replied 627d
Again satoshidice.com giving money to remove the chained tx limit ... Hope they'll remove this limit
Nikamoto
replied 629d
Isn't ABC just changing emission of new coins without paying themselves ?
678d
Tesla new all time high at $1795!

Strange times, guys! Strange times!
888d
First post from my Member server, connected direct to my BCHD node!
Much thanks to all that made the possible. <3
968d
Major new bug found in BCH implementations putting user funds at risk.

Nah. Only kidding. It's Lightning again.
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2019-September/002174.html
x2dm
replied 967d
That's totally their prerogative. Calling it "bad behavior" and asking other miners to "punish" them is precisely the socialist thinking Bitcoin was created to subvert.
976d
I've removed the 2,000 character limit on Member. Also Member won't amalgamate UTXOs anymore - you can post 25 trxs per UTXO per block now. With both these changes, you can post large amounts of text quite quickly.
978d
AI is going to pass us up before we know it
978d
Ya boi just got a raise. :)
Nikamoto
replied 977d
No you want to be n°1 on that
983d
Member is experimenting with replies upto 2000 characters
Nikamoto
replied 986d
Nikamoto
Hmm yeah actually btc/bch can become bsv too ..
Nikamoto
replied 986d
Nikamoto
But that was just some random thoughts not so important
Nikamoto
replied 986d
Nikamoto
You can't do that for LN because you need people private key
And can't do that for bsv because there will be too much data hosted on the chain, would be a nightmare for every nodes
Nikamoto
replied 986d
Indeed I forgot that. But I guess you'll just have to write on the chain "X has 10spice, Y has 5" (so who has which token) and the token can work on the new chain
Nikamoto
replied 986d
Anyway if you just need 2048 just split it into 10op_return tx. I guess it's feasible
Nikamoto
replied 986d
Op_return and all tools from unwriter
Nikamoto
987d
Bch/bsv can't become btc due to coins stucked in LN
Btc/bch can't become bsv due to data stored on chain
Btc/bsv can become bch
Nikamoto
replied 987d
Why don't you build that on bsv ? The opreturn limit is enough
991d
Bitcoin must have capacity that far exceeds current demand.

Otherwise big fish may run tests that look a lot like the weekend stress test and conclude, 'It's not ready yet'.

BCH adoption won't necessarily be gradual
Nikamoto
replied 988d
Back in the 1990s : "I would never use the internet for my private data"
But I guess cloud storage is more efficient
Nikamoto
1055d
Liquid is cool
Bch people you need to build faster than they do, they are a company and you're a community
(Waiting for avalanche to be on main net)
Nikamoto
replied 1056d
To the memo protocol ? You are the only one developing it so you are the only one modifying the protocol. I don't think there is an alternative serious site that is a "memo clone"
Nikamoto
replied 1056d
Nikamoto
It works too with the retweet functionality that is missing here, if only 10% can rt it's weird
It's a good thing because the n1 should be the one that decides because who else should