Create account

1793d · Bitcoin Cash
BCH Discussions - GROUP Proposal: a protocol upgrade that brings native miner-validated tokens
Barricade
replied 1793d
This was proposed long time ago by BU, right? Without ABC they have a chance now.
replied 1793d
Maybe there was a reason why it was rejected. That ABC took a bad decision doesn't mean all of their decision were bad.
replied 1793d
Video unavailable
Watch this video on YouTube.
Playback on other websites has been disabled by the video owner.Watch on YouTube
replied 1793d
I'm not really convinced by the proposition. It seems messy and complex. Imaginary_username asked the good questions here.

Don't forget that Bitcoin Cash is supposed to be p2p cash.
replied 1792d
replied 1792d
Glad to see I'm not alone to be skeptical about this proposal.
replied 1793d
Increasing the utility of a thing increases its value and usecase as cash. At this point i don’t think a coin can pursue the p2p cash usecase on its own.
replied 1793d
Whether it be AS’s suggestion or Moeing, idk. Tech talk was mostly above my grade.
replied 1793d
Moeing/SmartBCH is a sidechain so there is no effect on consensus.
replied 1793d
Not saying we shouldn't have miner-validated tokens, but the proposal seems kind of messy and could affect protocol simplicity. There might be a better way to do this.
replied 1793d
| I haven't had time to study this matter. I believe there is another proposal called CashTokens but I don't know what it's worth.