Create account

replied 2289d
TrashPosterInTheDark
The point went over your head. NASA has nothing to do with all the different independant verification of this stuff.
1 / 60
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2289d
NASA has everything to do with your endoctrination
replied 2289d
What does NASA have to do with all the different independant sources? What do you think NASA is actually capable of? Faking it might be harder than just going.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2289d
Of course it's hard. NASA should try harder because they are bad at it.
replied 2289d
They instead actually go to space. Wait, do you not belive in sattalites at all? Do you belive in low earth orbit?
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2287d
Low earth orbit is possible.
replied 2287d
Okay, if LEO is possible, then what is so hard about getting to the moon? Also, do you think the videos from LEO are real?
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2287d
What is so hard getting to the moon? Ask NASA. I'm not the one who tried and failed.
replied 2287d
What about the probes that have orbited the Moon? What about the probes sent to other planets, and other words moons? Where they all faked in your opinion?
replied 2286d
What probes? ,what planets?, show me something apart from cgi.
replied 2286d
NASA may use a lot of artists renditions, but you can see the real images and data. They are just not as impressive for the public. Some are though, like you Pale Blue Dot shot.
replied 2286d
Real images of the probes in orbit? where?
replied 2286d
There are also all the photos taken on the surface of Mars, and the shots of landing on Titan. None of those are CGI.
replied 2286d
replied 2286d
Nasa lies more than Blockstream lol
1
547
replied 2286d
That is cute to call it a hoax, but there is nothing behind those claims. Where as there is evidence of the various cradtvthat have landed on and orbited other worlds.
replied 2286d
landing on Titan, real photos, where?
replied 2286d
Perhaps this:
replied 2286d
No this is fake cgi, stereographic projection.
replied 2286d
Here are some seemingly real pics: https://www.space.com/16130-titan-landing-saturn-moon-huygens-pictures.html
replied 2286d
The are composites ( a combination of components.) made from Spectral Radiometer data, to try and create a real image.
replied 2286d
All digital cameras a made from spectral radiometer data to create a real image. Some are composite of many images, some are single shots.
replied 2286d
As i said, these are composites not real image,
https://sensing.konicaminolta.us/blog/what-is-the-difference-between-radiometers-spectrometers-and-spectroradiometers/
replied 2286d
From what you and Sam have sent, its clear you have not looked into the moon landings and have believed msm, just like i and many did until we researched ourselves.
replied 2286d
Oh I have looked into it. I just can see that the easily verifiable Moon landing did indeed happen.
replied 2286d
Well seems like your struggling to verify anything just now.
replied 2286d
I am not struggling at all. I am not the one making wild claims that require evidence to verify. I pointed to many easily findable images though. The Pale Vlue dot being a good one.
replied 2286d
Your proof is very weak considering the amount of money nasa get from taxpayers. Your images are cg, photoshop, 3d max etc.
replied 2286d
It is not a composite. It is a simple shot that shows the Earth as a pale blue dot seen from the outer solar system.
replied 2286d
you seem to be retarded as well:



What do you expect from us? Flying to titan to take a selfie for the retards like you? XD
replied 2286d
Also, please detail where's the profit in faking NASA. I'll wait here.
replied 2286d
United States Tax payers has spent $601.31 billion (in nominal dollars) on NASA.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_of_NASA
replied 2286d
Quite alot of profit for some grainy fake images and no real video footage of anything.
replied 2286d
Are you really claiming that all of NASA's activities are faked? All of that staff are actors and every breakthrough is basically pseudo-science?
replied 2286d
You tell me lol
a few years ago i was exact the same as you and sam, laughing at those that deny moon landings, then i actually researched alot, you will see the same eventually too.
replied 2286d
I'm yet to see evidence or even a decent argument for moon landing skepticism.
replied 2286d
That is because you believe nasa and msn, stepback and start looking for proof yourself and you will see there is none.
replied 2286d
Dude... I've been reading... a lot. Please at least try to support your claims. The "find proof yourself" line is such an idiotic way to dodge this.
replied 2286d
im not dodging, im trying to say is, it takes time and you will realise the same as me eventually, ask away im being honest and trying to be helpful.
replied 2286d
You are basically claiming that several thousands of people are in on the fraud and yet we still have 0 whistle-blowers.
replied 2286d
you sound like a btc noob that just bought bitcoin but knows nothing about blockstream. lol
replied 2286d
Then you should have no problem with supporting your opinion. Why do you think that the moon landings were fake?
replied 2286d
so many reasons,
the moon landing video fake, studio made
no video of earth from space, its all cg.
nasa admit destroying all tech and videos.
did you watch astronauts gone wild?
replied 2286d
"did you watch astronauts gone wild?"

You're not helping your case. :D
replied 2286d
That video is what began my journey to waking up. watch it.
replied 2286d
That video has tricked you. It began your journey based on false premises leading down false paths.
replied 2286d
No if you listen to when Bart asks Buzz about the footage, Barts footage was genuine, it revealed how Nasa faked the Earth shot.
That is just one of many many reasons.
replied 2286d
One of many inadequate reasons. They didn't fake the Earth shot if you listen.
replied 2286d

Listen and watch carefully,
I always wanted to go to space, i know alot, then i found out the truth.
i have nothing to gain from this,lol
replied 2286d
I skipped ahead to it. Man is it funny how much se tells you what you will see before you see it. You can tell she is full of shit and misleading people about what they see.
1
555
replied 2286d
Dude, your wrong
Here is the full video, 2things,
1- the video has another voice telling them when to speak, it says "talk"
2- they are looking out a window and the light gives it away
replied 2286d
An idiot, harassing people and asking astronauts to swear on the bible started your journey?

If I had to guess, I'd say you are religious and believe in paranormal BS too.
replied 2286d
Actually im not religious and i have never seen a ghost lol
replied 2286d
watch it, ok ill tell you, at around 8mins Bart asks Buzz why they faked earth pictures
i looked into images for earth and what the hell Bart was talking about, turns out he was right.
replied 2286d
then Alan at 10mins ,the Van allen belts had no effect on them and they went through because....they were not discovered,lol .
Like i said many things, van allen belts is another.
replied 2286d
The Van Allen belts are not a barrier. Going through them quickly is fine. It is just an issue of sensitive equipment with an orbit that spends significant time in that belt.
replied 2286d
here some more lol
replied 2286d
That is just fake conspiracy stories.
1
1,024
replied 2286d
Yes, they do not get nearly enough money. There is so much more potential if they had better funding instead of that paltry sum.
replied 2286d
TrashPoster is hopelessly retarded. We'll never get back the time wasted on him.
replied 2287d
Do you doubt China landed abprobe on the Moon as well? Does NASA control China?


About Privacy Terms Stats