Create account

1990d
I can't see how anyone could argue Core didn't shift the roadmap to a *wished* LN, fully knowing it will fail, as a way to stunt on-chain scaling development, all for the final ends of moving the bulk of transactions
replied 1990d
to a custodial service running on proprietary solution. Think about it. Why would they assign only a single BS dev to work on the LN if everything for BTC to succeed depends on the LN?
replied 1990d
An obligatory proof they deliberately sunt scaling is the paper showing a way to easily reduce the number of fullnodes without changing the degree of overall consensus rules validation