You are one who frames my post as sinister. Again it was neutral info, original title, relevant to the topic. Keep on exposing your troll tactics. We'll see who's posts will age well.
I wasn't the one who framed it. Are you really trying to deflect from something you posted once you realised it doesn't mean what you thought?
Funny how you choose to keep responding to this post. About me supposedly framing a news article about $1B paid to media. Neutral info but you keep going how I made it look sinister.
What you're really trying to say is; gene therapy makes the jab sound sinister, therefor its a conspiracy theory. But you fucked that up so now ur trying to lay that shit on me here.
The post was framed in a sinister way. It was not neutral. As for the gene therapy stuff it is nonsense. There is likely not real lawsuit about the semantics of the vaccine.
Explain. How can one frame a news article when he's using the original title and sharing it on a social media platform without adding any words or graphics. You're delusional.
The title is the framing... Do you not understand that?
No I do not stand under that. You're seeing ghosts. It was the original title and it was purely informative.
Play innocent if you want. You posted something to back up your general ideas, and it failed. Now your just claiming it was a meaningless post like a post about the weather.
You're full of shit as you have perfectly demonstrated yourself. Thank you for validating my points.
Then again there are lot of frivolous lawsuits. A lot of anti-vaxxers point to frivolous lawsuits as evidence for their absurd claims. Pointing to a claim as evidence for that claim.
That's not the point. You can distract all you want again. It's about what the attorney at law said. You're not the one who decides he got no evidence. Who do you think you are?
The attorney doesn't matter. He says whatever his clients want said. It has nothing to do with evidence, or facts. Nothing the lawyer has changes the facts of the vaccine.
"The attorney doesn't matter." You mean; I guess you were right, it's not just bloggers from their moms basement. Bad bot.
It most likely is just a blogger, and there is no real lawyer. Just a fake story about one. Even if there is one he is just a mouth piece for his clients.
None of that matters because you can't sue the vaccine makers for calling them a vaccine instead of gene therapy. No one cares about the semantics and bullshit.
Sure SILENTSAM the pharmashill troll. The attorney is just a blogger... You must have done some fucked up shit like you're afraid of something. You can't stop what's coming tho.
I listen to actual attorneys who go after pharma companies. Not fake blogs that make these non issues into stories. Even the people who hate big pharma think the vaccine is safe.
