Create account

replied 1174d
I don't dismiss him simply on gossip. I dismiss him because his peers dismiss his claims. They know the subsequent research that has gone on since he did some work early on.
replied 1174d
His work was not fundamental at all. He was just part of a team. He worked on a small part of the issue like many others.
replied 1174d
He is looking for 15 minutes of fame. This has been more lucrative for him than his career.
replied 1174d
Yup. You're validating my point again. Not once have you dared to address any of the things he's saying. All you do is slander. You just did it again, and you even deny doing it.
replied 1174d
So quit your act. And stop lying. We all know it's not about this one scientist. The pattern in your bullshit trolling methods is obviously exposed. You're a disgrace to real science.
replied 1173d
I'm not a research scientist. Your and my comments on the subject are irrelevant. My education was physics and computer science, not biology. I know enough to trust the peer review.
replied 1173d
You think I am exposing troll tactics. I am trying to expose you to critical thinking and skeptical thinking tactics. Exposing you to tactics capable of spotting deception.
replied 1174d
You do dismiss based on gossip and a smear campaign. You talk about "claims" all the time, but you don't even know what "claims" cause you dismissed him and other scientists similarly.
replied 1173d
I don't need to know his claims to trust his peers. I don't care what medical doctors think about particle physics the same way they don't care what I think about virology.
replied 1173d
A few quacks can, and should, be dismissed without listening to them when the vast majority of scientists in the same field explain why the quacks are wrong. That is trusting science.
replied 1173d
Glad we can agree that you *are unscientific and ignorant. Because we're NOT dealing with just a few quacks. Keep pretending it's all just bloggers. Cognitive dissonance is a bitch.
replied 1172d
Oh it is just a few quacks. There is no actual scientific reason to consider the vaccine unsafe. You have never been able to back up your aims with anything credible.