Create account

replied · 274d
If they get ABC to add replay protection they can claim the royal blood line later. They clearly plan beat BTC as well as BCH.
replied · 274d
Adding replay protection signals defeat like it was with BTC.
replied · 271d
Now go bury your head in the sand and celebrate.
replied · 270d
Nah, we're just glad you toxic people are gone while you burn your finite bitcoins and lawyer up for your ICOs.
replied · 271d
You are right. LOL
replied · 274d
That would be like getting a dog to chase a ball while you are holding a piece of meat.
replied · 273d
Maybe not, also to consider BCH changed the difficulty algo, so really the "royal blood" was already contaminated. So BTC could always claim that neither BCH nor BSV have it.
replied · 273d
But segwit was such a change that BCH can claim closest to white paper. Now SV can say it's even closer due to checkpoints.
replied · 274d
BTC is a bit harder to beat
replied · 273d
I'm not a shill, but I am curious to talk to a person who thinks BTC is not broken. Lighting network is a piece of shit, Segwit took signatures out of the chain of signatures
replied · 273d
0 Conf doesn't work, and the core people really think they can scale globally with a 1mb block size. Honestly I want to know, what part of this cluster fuck do you see as valuable?
replied · 273d
BTC segwit breaks the model, it's no longer bitcoin. It's junk. I would love to have a real debate about this. There is no way BTC can claim it's best. It's just using the brand.
replied · 273d
I think btc is broken too, but somehow LN might work or BTC might become a store of value like gold (and be usefull for some usecase, like Komodo DPoW)
Id love to see a real debate too
replied · 274d
BTC will fail by itself. There will be no more fake stablecoin pumps.