You're one of those racists aren't you! My sources are quite clear on the matter, and I have seen this pattern many times before! Those who say "rational reading skills" are racist!
Misinterpreting sexism as racism is a word crime. Next someone will accuse me of being 'sexist' against females, which would be as wrong as. Which "sex" should I denigrate ?😇
I thought I was following protocol by calling you racist purely because of the denigrating properties of the word. Maybe I need to study more "critical race theory" do do this "right".
You failed to answer the question. Let me help: Which of the 14 genders in the rainbow game am I denigrating ? Take your time, stay calm, we have all week to work through this.🤣
I must insist! The protocol requires of me to be upset about mistreatment of a theoretical third party, which I do no need to define. You are then guilty even if proven innocent.
Only according to some legislative mumbo-jumbo that insists on guilt or innocence. The rainbow constitution says that guilt and innocence are discriminatory binary and obsolete.
Nowhere in the protocol does it say that I need to show that said third party can exist in theory, or that it is likely that it was mistreated or that other factors are not important.
I am first to make such a claim, therefore I win by default, simple as that. You also don't get the denigrating part. The word only needs to be on the approved denigrating word list.
"default" is a concept belonging to the past. I hereby denigrate your denigrations denigrating the "People's vocabulary". I win by Trumping your Hillaryously obsolete default.