Create account

replied 1549d
Andrew
Is that the case where the indigenous people want to log on their land, but the university kids trespassing on their land won't let them?
Andrew
replied 1548d
The old Colonial divide-and-conquer playbook. Steal, impoverish, then bribe, gag & exterminate their hunting grounds. This fight is industry vs. our children. https://bch.gg/3q3
replied 1548d
No, it is a problem of indigenous governance. We see conflict between elected leaders and people claiming to be hereditary leaders. It's different for various First Nations.
Andrew
replied 1539d
They're "negotiating" under duress. The choice is, play along and get a pittance, or don't and get nothing. The land will be destroyed either way.
replied 1538d
That is not true. Canada is the only nation to allow oral history as evidence in court for land rights. The Federal government has become much better, but provincial governments are...
replied 1538d
... slower to change. The various First Nations people's face different situations, and some of the poorer bands have poor self governance, and corruption. Not all of it, but some.
Andrew
replied 1535d
https://www.focusonvictoria.ca/forests/72
>The Pacheedat will get the equivalent of three-tenths of one-percent of the “fibre” value of the forest Teal removes from their property.
replied 1534d
That is a pretty bad article that twists the reality. The Province can not tell the band what to do. They want to use logging to make money. The protesters are trespassing on native
replied 1534d
... land and have no right to impose their views on the band living there.

These protesters imposing their morality over the indigenous people are wrong.
replied 1534d
BC old growth is already protected, but if some indigenous people want to allow logging on their reserves that is their choice. Protesters do not have the right to protest it.
replied 1534d
They have a right to protest on their own lands, but not on reserve lands. It's almost racist to tell First Nations what they should do with their own land.
Andrew
replied 1548d
I'm not opposed to logging. The province needs to change stumpage rates so companies will instead cut second growth.
replied 1538d
Most old growth is already protected in BC. You do not see old growth logging anymore.