Do you not agree that not all lack of information comes from censorship? If I sold you a car than will break down quickly, I would not call me not giving you this info "censorship".
In that case I would call it cognitive dissonance, as you voluntarily bought a car, then call it a scam, to avoid to admit own fail, show me a real scam and i show you the censorship
Hm, I am not sure I should assume you are serious here, but... In my example YOU voluntarily bought a car, not me.
One example would be, legal system forbids outsiders to read on cases, only certified lawyers are allowed if they pay massive fee to gain access to data:
Another example would be, pharma wants to sell a drug, they order to make 100 studies but each one that doesnt fit their agenda stays unpublished, they sell harmful drugs for profits
