Create account

replied 1827d
Not a crime, and victimless is not brought up as it is irrelevant.

If a person would die unless connected to your circulatory system you should not be forced to have them connected.
replied 1827d
Your concept of not being a person till you pass a magic line doesn't make much sense. Which conjoined twin is a human, & which isn't. Simply declaring irrelevance isn't sufficient.
replied 1827d
Birth is a very objective line. The issue of personhood is irrelevant because it changes nothing. Sure, call a fetus a person, but abortion is still fine.
replied 1827d
You are arguing circles. A baby would not die if it was removed from the circulatory system the day before it would be born. Therefore, you just declared it a human.
replied 1827d
The day before it is to be born is irrelevant as abortions happen during the first trimester.
replied 1827d
In a late term abortion, it is required to kill the baby before it is removed, otherwise it magically becomes a baby if it was removed alive.
replied 1827d
Late term abortions are rare, and usually only happen due to medical complications. They are irrelevant as they would happen even if regular abortions were illegal.
replied 1826d
You contradict yourself a lot.
replied 1826d
Can you point out one time I have done so?
replied 1825d
"...abortions happen during the first trimester."

"Late term abortions are rare..."

That's just the one I was talking about here.
replied 1825d
That is not a contradiction at all. Abortions happen during the first trimester, except in extreme situations. Late term abortions are irrelevant to the issue of abortion rights.