I’m declaring BSV #1. I can’t even text a decent size message because ABC is still locked at 200 characters. BSV is 65,000. What a shit Bitcoin BTC and BCH are
What SILENTSAM said, and besides the OP_RETURN size is not consensus but a node config. Easier to config the 3-5 miners (LOL) on BSV.
It's as easy as calling Calvin
It's hard to understand competition and capitalism I know. In BCH I guess every raspberry needs to be consulted of approval.
Not really. The network is just bigger. BSV is basically a village with crickets.
You sound like core 2.0. Not surprisingly, they also have no idea what is competition.
So stop snowballing Amaury and configure your hobby node? Or you prefer to be stuck with limits and confinement 🤷🏻♂️😂😂.
Feeling a little salty? I guess you need to increase at least _one_ metric :-D
One node has almost zero effect on a real decentralized network
Completely understand and agree. I only respect mining nodes. That’s why I made fun of adjusting the ABC “hobby” node. BSV is
#1.
I just love when the retards of Statist Vision claim that they only respect miners while BTC has 90%+ of the global SHA256 hashrate.
Not to mention BCH having 6x the miner activity compared to BSV.
#MinersChoice right? LOL
6x the miner activity... lol... what kind of metric do you use in alphabetland to get this multiplicator? It has to be unicorns or something.
...Unique miners? A single entity producing almost 50% of SV's hashrate does not a decentralized blockchain make. Could at least disguise it as a pool, but Coingeek is an embarrassment
Quacking about decentralization just for the sake of it makes you sound like core 2.0
..and what you call "toy nodes" are merchants etc. You SV guys are like a religious cult.
Merchants can use specialized solutions, they not necessarily need to run nodes themselves. Especially when things scale, the burden of it won't cover the benefits.
In case of coordinating node configs it is easier with centralized mining like we see on BSV. That is basically all I am saying. Well, quacking or not, it is a fact.
It is easier, but not much. You need 3 pools on BCH and 2 on BSV to get 51%. One or two phone calls will do.
Unique miners can't be counted. There are 6+1 pools/big miners on BSV and 11+1 on BCH. So where your 6x came from? Decentralization is looked as being open and competitive for everyone
Lol the implication was that Calvin controls the grand majority of nodes. Of course it's easy to broadcast changes to SV, just call Centralized Calvin.
https://sv.coin.dance/nodes
Poolin has been mining BSV for weeks now also based on your link.
I'm talking about nodes lol, there's only one implementation for SV, and Coingeek likely controls most of them.
It's easy for Coingeek to point their miners at different pools too
The set of rules is set. That is decentralized. Decentralization refers to the rules. Remember that Craig and Calvin were majority miners keeping BCH alive at one point too
Other BTC miners mocked them for keeping BCH alive while it starved for hashpower
