Create account

1981d
1. The Hashwar has nothing to do with the mining incentive model since here external money is thrown to mine at a loss. It's not one chain attacking another chain, it's FIAT attacking usable crypto.
replied 1981d
2. the CSW Tweets should be regarded as noise since he was recruited to stop Bitcoin from scaling, not to have a profitable business: his "papers" and patents are just a cover story
replied 1981d
to lure in hashpower through market forces[1] to his chain.

3. at the bright side: when BCH is attacked by brute force it's a sign BCH dev hasn't been successfully co-opted.
replied 1981d
4. if BCH is to be worth anything it HAS to be attacked and be able to survive it.

[1] That's why he was pushed so incredibly hard in the media -
replied 1981d
to lure in hashpower to his chain and now that his mask came off and his obvious against Bitcoin he's recruiting BTCers, who's interest is BCH to fail, to help him.
replied 1981d
5. what "they" were planning all along was to divide the chain in as many splits as possible and to leave weaker and weaker chains. They know ABC can always change the PoW as last
replied 1981d
resort, but they will still make another step in the divide and conquer. All the useful hashpower is now sucked into the non threatening CRippled BTC which is working to mine a deadend
replied 1981d
with no future prospects chain, for a short-term profit, while the real problem they have, a Bitcoin that scales doesn't get hashpower for distant future value.