Create account

replied 1381d
DIE COMMUNIST SCUM
3 / 40 1
1
replied 1340d
Does this picture mean something significant to you?
replied 1340d
It's a war crime, now piss off sam, go talk to your loser friend dutchrebel.
replied 1339d
How is it a war crime?
replied 1340d
Ahh someone is feeling a little kranky today? Still didn't use that app to find hot cowboy sex in your area? Looks like you're gonna explode if you don't get that ass clapped soon.
replied 1340d
Kill yourself scumbag, you and your friends here are shit.
replied 1340d
At least I have super awesome friends here. The only people that want to be your friend are beggars who are after your satoshis.
replied 1340d
Please fuck off and die, you and your friends are greedy pieces of worthless shit.
replied 1340d
Gotta admit I'm a bit disappointed in the meager tips they give me. Maybe you're right, they are kinda greedy. I should lose those zeros and find myself some heros.
replied 1340d
Fuck off and die
replied 1381d
What do you think this picture even shows? Make a claim about this picture.
replied 1381d
Hard to keep track of who is a communist and who is a Nazi around here. Radical fools on all sides.
replied 1380d
Hey, is this you on tumblr proving the vaccines work?

replied 1380d
Nope, I don't use Tumblr.

Vaccines are not force fields. Infections are always possible. You get vaccinated to have a better immune response. That is how all vaccination works.The arguments you are using without thinking are the arguments against general vaccination. So are you still just a Covid anti-vaxxer, or have gone full anti-vaxxer?
replied 1380d
No No no. You can't pull that shit on me. Covid mRNA gene therapy shots are not vaccines.Actually I should say; Covid mRNA gene therapy treatments are not vaxxines. So please explain how I'm a anti-vaxxer.
1
replied 1378d
They are vaccines. You can not redefine words as an argument. You have moved to using general anti-vaxxer arguments. Likely your sources are pushing you in that direction.
replied 1378d
They aren't vaccines. Do you know what therapy means? That's what this is, gene therapy, a medical treatment. Therapy. To affect disease outcome. Nobody redefined any terms.Prove mRNA jabs stimulate immunity and disrupt transmission, then I'll accept your accusation of being "anti-vaxxer". Until then you're anti-science. Discrediting doctors isn't science
replied 1377d
It is not a gene therapy at all. It affects the disease outcome by having shown your immune system an inactive form of the virus to let your body develop immunity. Aka a vaccine.Vaccines disrupt transmission only through reaching your body to have a faster immune response. No vaccine has some secondary mechanism for preventing transmission.
replied 1377d
That's not an acceptable answer. You're still the anti-science for discrediting over 10k health pros advocating focused protection, and everyone else who doesnt fit your believe systemIt's stimulating cell to become a pathogen creator. mRNA gene therapy. "Waning" immunity ad doesnt transmit disruption. They don't work. Your 20 times safer story is just some bullshit
replied 1376d
Your false dichotomy doesn't fit. Focused protection was always going on, as well as general protection.
How the vaccine provides the important spike protein is irrelevant.My 20 times safer number comes from a doctor who investigates and litigates against big pharma. He pushes for more healthy living than medicine. He acknowledges the vaccines effective.
replied 1376d
I think it's important.
https://www.swfinstitute.org/news/91484/scientists-discover-dna-chunk-in-covid-that-matches-moderna-patented-sequence-from-before-pandemic
replied 1376d
Why do you think that?
replied 1376d
You're so good at making assumptions, but you can't figure out the relevance? There's only a one-in-three-trillion chance that sequence randomly appeared through natural evolution.
replied 1375d
I was asking you to link it to what we were discussing, but I get that you deflect and distract when you realise your argument failed.As for this article making claims about some study, it is meaningless. As with most articles the scientists likely are not saying what the article claims.You need to learn to listen to scientists rather than articles making claims about studies.
replied 1375d
Quoting an article is not making claims. Bad bot.
replied 1374d
You quoted the claim. It is a claim.

Poor advertising is irrelevant. It is misleading as well, immunity doesn't wane. The current antibody count does though, as it should.
1Q6Y3jfWN4YMc8cF
replied 1374d
"Among the 4,206 Germans infected with Omicron for whom their vaccination status was known, 95.58% were fully vaccinated. More than a quarter of them had booster shots."
replied 1373d
"Given that the overall background rate for vaccination in Germany is 70%, this means that the shots now have a -87% effectiveness rate against Omicron".
replied 1373d
I am surprised their vaccination rate is so low, at 75% fully vaccinated.
Bow look at the numbers in the ICU's, and that vaccination rate. That is how you see the vaccine effectivenessIn BC, Canada, about 91% are fully vaccinated, and while most people in the hospital are vaccinated, it is the ICU's that have mostly unvaccinated people. That is the point of vaccines
replied 1373d
No that's not the point of vaccines. You're proving my point again. You can't prove that the mRNA gene therapeutics provide immunity and disrupt transmission.
replied 1372d
Yes, that is the point of all vaccines. To prepare your immune system to do the work. The data proves the vaccine works. Your attempt to deny the numbers is amusing though.


About Privacy Terms Stats