Create account

replied 1754d
replied 1754d
All that page shows is they're a honest non-profit taking out net zero profit and use classic investigative journalist tactics. Again, how are they not truthful?
replied 1754d
We reading the same page?

>Project Veritas does not appear to disclose its donors

It lists most of botched stings and scandals they were involved in, PV is entirely lobbyist funded
replied 1754d
botched sting != dishonest
replied 1754d
Just look into James or Eric O'Keefe, they're mostly Koch-funded far right special interest conmen. James has a history of failed attempts at it though lol
replied 1754d
"Muh soros" - "muh coke brothers" - "muh koch"

Their content is mostly full-context raw clips, make your own decision reporting. What news used to be, donors are irrelevant
replied 1754d
You're just being dishonest now, they have rarely if ever released raw clips, WaPo had to release their footage in order to show the full story of their most recent botched sting
replied 1754d
Video evidence doesn't lie (soon will with deepfake). There are tons of other people who have done the same kind of election fraud undercover vids. I linked several other sources too
replied 1754d
Please be aware that this account is not affiliated with the Ulbricht family. They are trolling scum. Proof: