Create account

replied 2229d
Any 'Faucet' funding facility is best implemented with layered limitations.
Indeed - the mempool limit does help.
A faucet 'queue' may also help.
1 or few posts per block?
replied 2228d
The faucet does have set limits. Agreed it should be limited by the Memo app, not the BCH network.
replied 2228d
One other idea occurs:
An "unfunded posting page"
where new accounts could test-submit what they propose to post
"We" could sponsor such posts that have merit, paying the tx fee.
replied 2228d
Wow, I really like this idea. Maybe make it so that once the tipped total exceeds the required sats, have it write to the chain
replied 2228d
It would require a new page or sub-section under 'feed'?
where unfunded posts could be triggered by sufficient tips - which then pays the tx fee.
make sure OP gets subsequent tips.
replied 2228d
Creative
replied 2228d
In this ephemeral fashion objectionable material may fail "the sponsor test".
After some timespan (24hr?) unsponsored material would simply vanish.
(This is only for the unfunded).
replied 2228d
This - I meant to squeeze in that very important aspect:
Limits set by the mechanism sourcing funds.
(as opposed to "baked into the protocol" which would be disastrous)