Create account

Fnuller15
replied 1940d
Bitcoin Faucet
Which of the SV opcodes are mentioned in the whitepaper? NONE
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 1940d
The ones included in Bitcoin 0.1 which blockstream removed.
You must be new to this.
Fnuller15
replied 1940d
You seem religious about this version 0.1.
Do you think that Satoshi was a God or something? Why is bitcoin made as opensource if it was never meant to be optimized and improved upon?
Salty
replied 1940d
Scaling matters. Wormhole dsv illegal bucket shops,PoS is not bitcoin . Bitcoin is capitalist, bitcoin PoW, bitcoin scales come join the party bitcoin is back and it scales bitcoin SV
Barricade
replied 1940d
Right now, BSV scales as well as ABC, because their code is (mostly) the same. And, if you can emulate DSV with current OP codes, then Bitcoin according to CSW is illegal.
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 1939d
Here is an article that shows how CTOR doesn't scale
https://medium.com/@g.andrew.stone/why-abcs-ctor-will-not-scale-8a6c6cf4a441

All the people with half a brain left you guys.
Barricade
replied 1940d
Seriously, there are so many things wrong in your post I don't know where to start. Bitcoin is permissionless, 2nd layer solutions don't need your permission. There's no PoS in Bitcoin
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 1939d
Avalance is the first step to POS.
Barricade
replied 1939d
The first step to POS will be outsourcing txs validation, which alters the economic incentives of Bitcoin.
Salty
replied 1939d
Dam right
Salty
replied 1939d
Miners need permission from there dev bosses bitcoin is capitalist ABC is just like core communist posing as libertarians that why miners chose bitcoin sv
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 1939d
User name checks out.
Barricade
replied 1939d
Maybe you won't believe me, but there are several clients on BCH. No miner has been sent to jail yet (hint, hint).
Hurensohn
replied 1939d
SV supporters are the communists. they want government regulation. ABC stands for really free markets
replied 1940d
Locking down the code goes against Satoshi's vision.
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 1939d
That was a really deep statment.
Improving code that doesn't change the economics of the protocol is fine.
The problem is when an bunch of communist come here and concern troll.