Few hours ago, there was over 20 blocks mined in one hour. Now we have opposite. It looks like some miner is testing how much he can stress network by swinging hash power btc<>bch.
Might just be variance, but activity from the last few hours is nearly all from 'known' miners with activity from 'unknown' miners has dropped off significantly.
I did turn off my equipment, I gotta by some new miners soon. These miners are not profitable with the solar panels I have, I need new stuff. I am sure others are having same problem.
You can send unsustainable miners to #Venezuela and we get the running here for you, you earn 50% of the revenue. In this paradise the electricity cost is so low. #realbitcoinclub
I develop for a BCH fork (DeVault) and we use the LWMA algo.. It's worked out well for us and we experience much much larger variations in our hash rates due to being a micro-cap.
This kind of ignorance lead to the failure of BTC. Their propaganda was that "every attempt to rise the blocksize limit (direct on-chain capacity increase) is an attack on #Bitcoin".
My, aren't you saucy today. Well, think what you wish. The block size limit was a hack to protect the fledgling network that was no longer necessary, so I never would argue to keep it.
Please come back when you improved your reading comprehension. Most people believed that rising on-chain capacity is an attack. this is why we are on a minority fork with little hash.
Ultimately, most of the big decisions from the original bitcoin were good. You still haven't explained how a different POW would prevent the same problems. I suspect you cannot.
What same problems? it would instantly make the network a lot stronger and better proposition for investors/users. It would enable a positive feedback loop imo.