Create account

cbeastsv
replied 1977d
replied 1977d
"FACT" They are mining blocks, we know that. It's an "OPINION" That they are mining blocks to Re ORG ABC. And there is a greater probability they are not
cbeastsv
replied 1977d
You have it all figured out.
replied 1977d
Yes. It's easy. There is fact and then there is opinion. Some people like to claim opinion as fact.
cbeastsv
replied 1977d
Yes you do.
replied 1977d
What have I claimed was fact that was opinion? Dash is the one saying it's 100% fact they are Re org ABC. That's what this is about.
cbeastsv
replied 1977d
I stand corrected. They may do more than a reorg, but it makes no sense to not reorg if not to just discredit miners using checkpoints as dangerous financial securities instruments.
replied 1977d
No because you will be wiping out transactions and people will lose money. Once the media gets a hold of that, crypto is over.
cbeastsv
replied 1977d
Reorgs happen naturally. Checkpoints don't. The blame will be on the checkpoints.
replied 1977d
No the blame will be on CSW and NCHAIN.
cbeastsv
replied 1977d
Blame from courts may differ from media blame.
replied 1977d
Everything will end up in Media's hands. If miners do shit behind the scenes that doesn't affect people's money, they will probably get away with it.
cbeastsv
replied 1977d
EDA + Proof of Checkpoint + Exchange bias = permissioned POW
replied 1977d
BCH is fast cheap and reliable and will work as money for the public. That's all the public needs to know. If they start losing their digital money, the game is over.
cbeastsv
replied 1977d
The game may indeed be over.
replied 1977d
Not unless BCH becomes something other than fast, cheap, and reliable.
replied 1977d
The funny thing is you keep throwing out all this technology and have no clue about the base who would actually be using BCH. Apple makes phones for the average user. Not for the techs
replied 1977d
But once they start losing money. It's over.