Create account

1502d · bitcoin
Peter Rizun explains why we need multiple competing BCH node implementations -
;feature=emb_logo
replied 1493d
Free Trade i accidentally sent you 1000 BTCMYK coins instead of 100 coins, will you be humble and return 900 BTCMYK coins back.
replied 1492d
Yes, but there is a processing fee of 1 MEMBER token.
replied 1492d
how to get that?
replied 1502d
Up to now, we've had a Technology Lock In problem - https://wiki.mises.org/wiki/Technology_lock-in

It'll be interesting to see if ABC's misstep will help us break the Lock In, or if
replied 1502d
Agreed. We need the different miners to use >= 3 node implementations and we need a formal (and finished) specification of BCH which both serves as the go to reference guide and the
replied 1502d
compromise (ie. the set of consensus rules that everybody can agree on).
replied 1502d
we just get locked in to a different node implementation.

There is some theory that 2 implementations is unstable - but if we get miners using 3 or more, it's stable. I'm hoping we
replied 1502d
see some miners stay with ABC, some use BCHN, some BU, some BCHD and Flowee and Verde.
replied 1500d
I thought BCHD didn't include mining? Same with Verde but they're working towards it... or am I wrong here? I honestly don't know much about Flowee...