Create account

replied 1946d
I agree that there are competing design goals. Privacy, speed, price.
XMR wins on privacy and price (less than BCH for txn fees) but still has a PoW block wait time (only 2 mins tho)
replied 1946d
XRP wins on speed and price: <5 sec to confirm and essentially free to use ($0.000001/tx or somesuch) but is no more private than a Visa card or vanilla BCH
replied 1946d
BCH is 2 hundredths of a penny. If something is cheaper nobody is going to care. Wallet generates speed. Like I say nothing is faster than the Bitcoin.com wallet. NOTHING.
replied 1946d
And as for faster... XRP confirms *on-chain* in 5 seconds or less(!)
No PoW coin is ever going to match that; it's just not a compatible design.
replied 1946d
0 conf works just fine. .
replied 1946d
If you don't mind people paying you... and the smart ones taking their money back after you're "paid"
replied 1946d
Only 1 out of 4000 attempts is able to pull off a double spend. Not 4000 transactions. 4000 attempts.
replied 1946d
Agreed that below a tenth of a penny almost nobody cares. But if you want to support HFT and price discovery in a real DEX to match wall street, $0.001 >> $0.000001
replied 1946d
XRP is no better than an excel spreadsheet.
replied 1946d
Excel spreadsheets are centralized. XRP is not. I assume you have not read the ILP RFCs, as I have. https://bit.ly/2yvUvog
replied 1945d
XRP is a centralized scamcoin.
replied 1946d
Muh Zimbabwe bank partnership...

XRP can suck my nutsZ
replied 1946d
Cashfusion has more combinations than Atoms in the Universe when shuffled. Not exactly vanilla.
replied 1946d
XMR mixes 11 randm UTXOs with each txn. That is also more combos than atoms in the universe. That alone is not enough to protect you. Are the input&output addresses & amount encrypted?
replied 1946d
That was a cool point of interest for selling the program.
replied 1946d
Wait until it's official on the Bitcoin.com wallet and then we will take a look at those Darknet numbers.
replied 1946d
Not so mention that XRP is a security and it is only a matter of time before it is legally classified as such.
replied 1946d
Less than BCH in transaction fees? Last time I used XMR it was $0.6 for one single transfer
replied 1946d
You’re paying extra for anonymity; not necessarily a bad thing.
replied 1946d
I understand that but he's saying Monero is cheaper than BCH. That's technologically impossible
replied 1946d
According to the fee chart. Monero is more expensive. Had a fee as high as 20.00 in 2017. https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/transactionfees-bch-xmr.html
replied 1946d
Based and redpilled.
replied 1946d
Your numbers are very old. XMR had a major upgrade in 2018; fees have been less than $0.001 ever since
https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/monero-transactionfees.html
replied 1946d
The same link you provided shows fees around $0.02 the last three months. Still way more than BCH and I'm sure Monero usage is very low these days.
replied 1946d
I used monero as a user and developer. UX is pretty bad and it's almost not programmable because of privacy features. It's hard to see it grow when there are no apps except wallets.
replied 1945d
replied 1946d
If you look at the median fee for BCH it's .0007
replied 1946d
Let's be real. Monero has been out since 2014. It will never pass BCH unless something happens where it is SIGNIFICANTLY better than BCH. And right now it's not.
replied 1946d
What do you mean they are old? That's an updated fee chart. LOL Old fees are like .13-20 LOL
replied 1946d
Also, built in inflation...I dislike that part.
replied 1946d
The 0.6 XMR/block tail emission? It prevents XMR fees from going stratospheric like BTCs did from halving. It's also less than the expected amount of deflation (lost keys)
replied 1945d
That's what MoneroCoretards want you to believe and accept as fact.

"expected amount of deflation (lost keys)"

This is retardation, you can't possibly know how many are being lost.