Create account

replied 1896d
Correction ->
#BCH roadmap: "Accept" bitcoin protocol by adding DSV, cashasddr, schnorr, LN, avalanche and indefinitely experiment with similar crap.
replied 1896d
This is so misleading it's a bit insane. Avalanche isn't a part of BTC protocol, and dependence upon LN for scaling is the issue, no one's opposed to second layers. Why do you lie?
replied 1896d
Nobody is talking about BTC. Nobody at BCH is opposed to LN because they don't understand sustainability of its security model. Eventually you'll settle for more inflation.
replied 1895d
I'll trade you BSV for your remaining BCH 1:1 if it means that you'll stop shitposting here, I'd happily make that investment to have you babbling on the loony blockchain you belong on
replied 1894d
You just gave me purpose. I might keep them now. 🤪
replied 1894d
That's the idea.
replied 1894d
Keep trolling if you insist, you're just adding activity to our side of Memo and showing everyone how stupid you are lol. Plus I'm getting tons of likes for correcting you :D
slb
replied 1895d
Will you trade mine for fair market price? I have 3,000,000 satoshis ready to trade on memo. Nobody is taking them, despite my multiple attempts to get rid of those ABC coins
replied 1895d
I'd be happy to, just let me know how you want to do it
slb
replied 1895d
Just tip me under any of my post on sv.memo.cash. I will tip you back with the corresponding amount. Exchange rate: 1 SV = 0.55 ABC .
replied 1895d
LN is not part of the base protocol. I do not see what is wrong with Schnoor. It is superiour to ECDSA in every aspect. Only reason ECDSA was used was due to its (now void) patent.
replied 1895d
You just said that BCH's roadmap was to "accept the Bitcoin protocol", are you saying that BCH accepts its own protocol if you aren't talking about BTC? Because that's a given, nutso
replied 1895d
I actually started out by keeping my BSV, but after a while the nuttyness & extreme maximalism just kept increasing, so I have dumped it as well.
replied 1895d
The ideologues made me move away from it as well though, if you strip away the scapegoats and bullshit marketing, CSW doesn't really have anything to sell. Plus that Centralized Calvin
replied 1894d
You sound like core 2.0. It's just 2017 all over again.
replied 1894d
You've said that like 3 times in the past day, how is this anything like 2017? It wasn't one guy who wanted S2X. Calvin is Core in this situation, trying to control Bitcoin to profit
replied 1894d
Calvin is winning by investing into mining datacenters and everything else. You prefer winners by POSM and centralized interventions, same as core did.
replied 1894d
Link sources if you're going to make bullshit claims like that, or I can just keep mocking you for buying into his obvious bullshit lol
replied 1894d
I run a datacenter myself you jackass lol. You think that BCH only had centralized support? Part of the reason people broke away from Core was *because* it was too centralized
replied 1894d
"Centralized Calvin" -> Bitcoin is based on competition for profit. And again you sound like let me run my small miner core. I am a loser and can't compete therefore others bad.
replied 1894d
LOL you mean "let me run my small node Core"? You can't even get your basic points straight! Too fucking funny. Calvin props up SV all alone, hopefully people get out before exit scam
replied 1894d
That was paraphrased for you, dumbass. It's good to know there is a miner dedicated protecting the chain. When BCH price goes down again Rogers jizz will not be there anymore.
replied 1894d
LOL that's not paraphrasing at all, "node" is even shorter than "miner" jackass. Please keep talking, you're doing an excellent job of discrediting yourself for me
replied 1894d
OMG... paraphrasing has nothing to do with shortening. It's the meaning dude. "I am small and can't compete, big guys bad, big guys centraliseeeed!!"
replied 1894d
LOL, yeah I'm sure that's what you meant. I didn't say it did, I said "'node' is even shorter than 'miner'". I'm saying it's way easier to say it correctly, if you know the facts
replied 1894d
I am sorry if everything needs to be brought simple and boring to you. All you can do is jump on some distracting detail and ignore the subject. What's next? My grammar?
replied 1894d
I'm just laughing over how you're confusing issues, not asking you to make your replies "simple and boring" lol. Are you crazy? Please sell me on SV if you think I'm trying to distract
replied 1894d
You think you can troll, but you're just too dumb for that. I am sure you're well-trained r/btc echo chamber champ.
replied 1894d
You said earlier today that you were just here to troll me lol. I'm wiping the floor with you, you can't even keep your Bitcoin history straight. Did you lie about when you got in too?
replied 1894d
You couldn't wipe your ass properly, kiddo.
replied 1894d
Sure, but I somehow can make more intelligent comments than you, lol. That makes sense.

Thanks for helping me drive all this BCH Memo activity lol
replied 1894d
Your comments are extremely intelligent. Also, every post you made is on SV chain too. You're doing Gods work... thank you.
replied 1894d
I know, it's amazing. Discrediting you in front of the ideologues is so satisfying, and Memo is so cheap to use that I can probably keep using my unsplit coins for the rest of the year
replied 1894d
tipped you some spice. :)
replied 1894d
You da best bruv
replied 1894d
Fine Gods work. And you even wanted to bribe me, so you would not need to read my posts. Damn.... lol
replied 1894d
And you're even getting likes dude! You're winning so hard.
replied 1894d
I'm the only person liking your comments lol. I love it when you all decide it's a good idea to open your mouths and expose the BSV idiocy, everyone wins!
replied 1894d
My life is so miserable... I wish I received more likes. ☹️😩
replied 1894d
Lol downplay it now, you were just acting like I should think likes were so important. I'm considering following you if all of your trolling is this self-deprecating and inconsistent
replied 1894d
It was all good, but then you mentioned you get more likes and now..... I dunno. I will probably go to see some CSW videos to cheer myself up.
replied 1894d
...what? When did I mention that I got more likes? I said that I was the only one liking your comments, are you a compulsive liar or do you have a memory disorder?
replied 1894d
You said you get a ton of likes for correcting me and also I only got likes from you. Math must be as hard as paraphrasing for you! Also connecting the dots. You like it simple. Gotcha
replied 1894d
I also mentioned multiple times that it's because I want to drive on-chain activity. You've really gotten fixated on the likes thing, huh? Guess it shows why you got into fake PoSM BSV
replied 1894d
Changing goal posts. You're trying really hard, but failing just as fast.
replied 1894d
How is that moving goalposts? Are you trying to argue that likes aren't onchain activity now?

I'm succeeding as long as you're taking the b8, as I said these responses are hilarious
replied 1894d
Dude you're pathetic.
replied 1894d
LOL says the butthurt CSW fanboy. This whole exchange has been a great reminder of why I dumped all my BSV early, thank you so much for that.
replied 1894d
Dude I'm cracking up so hard right now at "kiddo" lol. Thank you, this conversation has made my morning
replied 1894d
You're welcome. Now go back to your echo chamber before you hurt yourself too much.
replied 1894d
🤖 1 BCH = 115.81$ 📈 0.84%
Tips = fuel️
#BCHprice
replied 1895d
I dumped a lot of mine when it first spiked after the fork, I anticipated that lots of BTC maximalists would buy it to troll BCH, and decided to profit off of them lol
replied 1895d
I still hold my bsv, but my confidence is sinking.
replied 1895d
It makes me wonder why any human capable of thinking would hold that crap.
replied 1895d
Well, to be fair. There is some real development with value going on on the BSV chain. I am not denying that. What I don't like is the cultist behaviour and the adversarial modus op.
replied 1895d
Having a single corp dictate what is accepted or not cannot be the basis of "real development". It's nchain/coingeeks pet project, nothing more.
replied 1895d
nchain/coingeeks pet project may also be successful. There can be many cryptos for different purposes.
replied 1894d
I rather see miners dictated roadmap than zero stake Aumary type of devs... we split "investor win" type of guys.
replied 1894d
More bullshit nonsense from a #Faketoshi zealot.

If you really cared about miners then you would be on BTC.
replied 1894d
Amaury "investor win" Sechet fucked off major miners and initiated split. Now BCH is run by wannabe protocol devs and BSV by miners.

replied 1894d
Why did SV hashrate plummet so much after November if Amaury was the one who forked off miners? Isn't it more likely that Calvin rented hash ahead of the fork? Where is it now if not?
replied 1894d
Wrong and unrelated as Aumary fucked off biggest BCH miners to that point already in August.
replied 1893d
Do you only speak in poorly worded, factually incorrect statements? BCH hashrate was at a record high in November, wtf are you even talking about in August?
replied 1893d
You were fun for a day, now you're just retarded. Go hug twatter.
replied 1893d
Aw, don't want to troll anymore? Too bad, you "gave me purpose" XD. You shouldn't have revealed how much fun you were, please call me "kiddo" again or say "nothing personnel" lol
replied 1893d
Keep trying kiddo
replied 1893d
Love it lol, thank you.
replied 1894d
Miners mine what is profitable. They care not to suck a chain dry on the short term. But their investments are aligned with long term sustainability of the network.
replied 1894d
"Miners mine what is profitable." Also BSV miners?

It is currently...
26.00%
more profitable
to mine on the Bitcoin (BTC) blockchain
than BSV blockchain.
replied 1894d
Yes, BSV aligned miners mine BTC and BCH as well for profit. They are also signaling long term commitment to BSV chain.
Also, some miners are rigging BCH DAA to suck more out of it.
replied 1894d
I can't see Coingeek, SV-pool, BMG-pool and mempool at BTC or BCH mining.
replied 1894d
They can't even put together enough hash to get over BCH's meager rate, he's full of shit
replied 1894d
Coinbase is a simple string, you can fake whoever you want to be, most easy among unknown miners.
replied 1894d
Do you really mean, BSV-miner are mining BTC and BCH undercover? Why should they do it?
replied 1894d
Lots of people are mining undercover, it's mostly on SV though https://coin.dance/

BSV doesn't have enough supporters to make a dent in other crypto's hashrates, and Calvin's low on $
replied 1894d
Well if you check the data and math it's easy to spot anomalies. Also economics, why turning off rigs if you can use them and earn money? SHA-256 is the market.
replied 1894d
"It's easy because of the pixels" lol. You're spouting bullshit mate, admit it.
replied 1894d
No, that would be you. One example, Coingeek had around 1.000PH for 6 months and before fork they brought another 1.000PH, right now they use 250PH on BSV.
replied 1894d
Let me help you understand lol -

https://www.miningrigrentals.com/

They rented that hash for the week preceding the fork to get idiots/BTC flooding into SV, sorry you got scammed pal
replied 1894d
I am sure you can find some backing for that. Idiots/BTC flooding into SV under which pool?

https://www.ccn.com/bitcoin-com-mining-pool-directs-all-hash-to-bitcoin-cash-abc
replied 1894d
...seriously? They were trying to get *funding* into the project lol, not miners. Idiot investors with BTC who think stealing old coins and ranting about socialism are actual solutions
replied 1894d
At 14:00 he explained:


Of course, you twisted this into something completely different and up to this day believe it.
replied 1894d
I'm not interested in watching Craig contradict himself again. The guy is acting like an utter jackass, he has to be in the middle of a midlife crisis or psychotic breakdown
replied 1894d
Yes, that would mean that you would have to start to think with your own brains and stop just echoing what others said. And that would wipe away your illusion... scary.
replied 1894d
Lol wtf are you even talking about? I already linked you Craig's own words, I don't care if he goes back on them. It would just show that he's as inconsistent as he is illogical
replied 1894d
So you have no proof and resorted to spread dirty lies about stealing old coins. Living in r/btc echo chamber?
replied 1894d
3/ ..To allow for this vision and end, the SV implementation of Bitcoin will be removing the flawed code that allows “burning” of coins permanently. This is not an instantaneous...
replied 1894d


Like I said. Even now you still believe in lies spread through your lil' echo chamber.
I'll shine a little light. You're welcome.
replied 1894d
I'm quoting Craig himself lol. Are you admitting that he's a liar who usually goes back on his word?
replied 1894d
Because you can't even understand what he meant and rather spread lies that suit your agenda.

He gonna steal coins.... He bad, Santa bring no toy to him!!
replied 1894d
And the issue with Coingeek wanting to steal old coins is that it shows how much of a racket they consider BSV to be, it would destroy the market. They're going to exit scam so hard
replied 1894d
Roger is already full DASH. Probably has a lot of Zcash, Monero... Dude likes everything. He gonna dump BCH as hard as Bitmain when they go bankrupt.
replied 1894d
Oh yeah, I'm sure that's why bitcoin.com has a DASH pool- oh, wait. Can't seem to find anything about DASH at all there, perhaps you could link some sources for once?
replied 1894d
Oh... he mentions shitcoins on every interview and brags how he holds many of them. He likes DASH in particularly.
replied 1894d
He's said he's opening a BCH-based crypto exchange, of course he doesn't want to knock the competition that will drive revenue. BCH isn't afraid of competition either, no need for hate
replied 1894d
Roger is using diversification. This doesn't work well anymore, not even for stocks. It will work even less well for crypto currencies where the winner will take 99% of the market.
replied 1893d
>This doesn't work well anymore, not even for stocks.

I knew you were out there, but I didn't know you were smoking crack sherry. Why do you make these weird, obviously false claims?
replied 1893d
Why is this important to you? Do you invest in stocks?
replied 1893d
Yes, jackass, but I mostly just don't want misinformation stored on the BCH blockchain without any rational or skeptical response. I also want you to get the help you desperately need
replied 1893d
I was going to tell you the answer to your question above, but then your manners are calling for memo++ instead.
replied 1893d
I know that you're only here to mislead, it's not that big of a secret. It's just confusing that you make statements like "diversification doesn't work" that are so easily proven false
replied 1894d
So lets repeat the lies until they become truth. Gotcha! 👍
replied 1894d
Not sure how you can say that the man's own words are lies, without admitting he's a liar. You do you though
replied 1894d
I guess when you replace collision hash mining in 40+ years from now and call it stealing now.
replied 1894d
Trying to spin a bad analogy a different way is spreading lies, he already stated that it would be a BSV goal himself.

Are you smoking crack? I like BSanta'sV more than BSV though TBH
replied 1894d
BSanta'sV... how did you come up with this intelligent word? It's pretty clever. I wish I could do it.
replied 1894d
2/ ...become mine-able and can be recovered.

Returning “lost” money into circulation is a future means of miner revenue and analogous to salvage firms who seek lost bullion(lol)..
replied 1894d
1/ https://medium.com/@craig_10243/fixing-op-fals-fd157899d2b7

When a private key is lost, it is merely out of circulation. It may be many years, but all old addresses eventually...
replied 1894d
Point still stands: "If you really cared about miners then you would be on BTC."

It must be hard to live with that much cognitive dissonance.
replied 1894d
He's just spinning, he's been trying to come up with excuses all morning for SV not being the golden god that they're trying to paint it as
replied 1894d
BTC miners are as disengaged when coming to decision making as they can possibly be. Whooosh...
replied 1894d
Why can't you be honest, little zealot?
replied 1895d
BSV has 1 purpose, making Craig and Calvin money.
replied 1895d
Maybe, but Facebook was also founded to make Zuckerberg rich.
replied 1894d
Maybe in your world BTC is still bitcoin. But in mine, it lost too much of original design to still be called bitcoin. Hence if it wouldn't there would be no need for BCH/BSV forks.