Create account

replied 759d
The Token already exists from the start of Musicoin. It's not about creating a new one. But.. they need to find a new blockchain to pay these royalties in real time. Here Skale. But..
replied 759d
At the beginning, their blockchain was a kind of fork of ERC20, the miners paid the transactions in real time, and fed the UBI who pay the artists too.
replied 759d
Today they have to adapt the system to a blockchain that can do the same thing whitout high fees.
replied 758d
Yes, lots of blockchains have zero fees (Nano) or fees well under $0.01 (XMR, BCH)

Why did you need to create a store loyalty card, instead of using internet money?
replied 758d
Not sure to understand. They never had a "Store Loyalty Card".. but a Token Called: $Musicoin
replied 757d
My point is a special-purpose token like this is no different from a gift card. It's less functional than general purpose Internet Cash.
replied 757d
Okay, get it! But in this case who pays the artists, how? You have to find a model.
replied 755d
Patreon is working well for lots of creators. An artist can already show a QR code for dozens of cryptos all trying to be "peer to peer electronic cash" to varying degrees of success
replied 755d
Yes, I agree. But we are speaking about a music streaming site based on crypto (from the start). :0) They need to find an economic model to be able to pay the artist.. in a long term.
replied 755d
A streaming site? Okay I suppose.
A new crypto to support the site?
JUST. STUPID.
Ggo sell Applebee's gift cards; they're as much of an economic revolution.
replied 754d
You think you have the universal truth with your "Just Stupid". haha ha..
replied 754d
Come back to see me when you have something constructive to propose... this dialogue is sterile. (The site exist exist since 2018, nobody speak about a new crypto, etc).. haha.
replied 754d
> something constructive to propose

Free yourself from Trivium. Use existing cryptos as money. Especially the ones that best have the characteristics of peer-to-peer electronic cash.
replied 754d
Exactly.. I suggested at the end of my article if there could be a possibility with Bitcoin cash. Tossed the idea. Did you read the article?
replied 752d
Yes, I read the article. BCH is unfit for purpose as P2P electronic cash. Because of everything from undemocratic mining algos, to the fundamental non-privacy of posting txns in clear.
replied 752d
Ok, I can follow your reasoning again.
#Privacy first.
replied 755d
But I agree with that. It's what I want to develop for me this year.
replied 755d
Dude. THERE IS NOTHING TO "DEVELOP".
Crypto already exists. So does Patreon.
Maybe get Patreon to take crypto, that would be worthwhile.
Making a new crypto? Sure! Masturbation is fun!