Create account

replied · 329d
anarchovegan
In democracy no vote is seen as a vote. A vote for the status quo. Most people vote when they are unhappy with the system. So theoretically low voter turn out is approval of the system
anarchovegan
replied · 328d
You're going to ignore my and others' overt disapproval of the system and not voting that we are openly and loudly saying?
Nothing theoretical here. I don't approve.
replied · 322d
I see no vote as vote of no confidence. imagine starting a gov, you & 1000 ppl go off into a room & vote for a gov then tell the 100M other ppl you now rule them bc they didnt vote no.
replied · 321d
That scenario only works if the 100M others also were called into the room to vote, and only the 1000 people bothered to vote.
replied · 321d
I mean, things are typically official if they send you a letter or just put it in the news paper (like rezoning)
replied · 321d
The main reason you see strange bylaws and such is due to the few who do get involved. Often old people. The people have to make themselves heard.
replied · 320d
why though? you have a minority exerting their influence on the rest of us. not everyone has so much free time to continually fend off these advances.
replied · 320d
Home owners I guess are given extra notice, and consideration. As the property tax payers.
replied · 320d
I know a property that runs along the back of my, and others properties wanted to do a zone change to allow container storage. We all had to be consulted and given a chance to say so.
replied · 320d
Not true at all. Everyone can participate. If more participated they could easily overturn the whole system.
replied · 320d
yes everyone *can*. but you have people who's full time "job" is to meddle while the people whose lives they meddle in are busy living (working, raising families, hobbies).
replied · 320d
Yes, but they were elected to that job. On a whole it is a good system. There are elements that are not perfect. There are different places with different approaches.
replied · 315d
If they were elected by less than half the population would they still have a mandate to meddle?
replied · 315d
Depends on if this is a popular vote election, of a majority of districts election. There are pros and cons the each system. Germany uses both for their elections I hear.
replied · 315d
nah just if less than half the citizens participate (cast a vote). even if they all have the option/chance to.
replied · 315d
No vote counts as a vote with the majority.
replied · 321d
Civil/municiple politics are the easiest to get involved in, and yet people get involved least in their local politics. Which is funny when it can have more impact on you.