Create account

replied 1553d
On the other hand the risk of having multiple implementation is that (not intentional) differences in the consensus code can cause a split.
replied 1553d
True. There are pros and cons. However, I think the risk for a split is less dangerous (and much less dangerous than many make it out to be).
replied 1552d
I agree. Btc has had multiple implementations for most of its time and I don't know any of such issue.
replied 1552d
A split can be dangerous mostly for exchanges. Loss of the whole network for days are dangerous for the whole economy and for everyone.
replied 1551d
True. If an exchange end up accepting another chain which will later become a minority coin they can loose a lot of money. But I don't see a way to prevent it in an open economy.
replied 1551d
Installing two different core node software, and ensuring the balance is the same on both node. If not, cancel the transaction, and throw it back on the user.